You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Surviving Pandemic and Centralization

in #life5 years ago

I wasn't aware the one study with only eight participants was the only ace2 study. For some reason I was under the impression this factor was common knowledge. I think both Boyle and Adams were talking about ace2 matter of factually and if they did so based on a 8 participant study. Ehh, I doubt they both would fall for something like that?

Sort:  

This is why I discussed the Breitbart article. They don't cite sources. Look for sources. If there are no sources other than their unsupported claims, it's not reasonable to believe their unsupported claims IMHO.

I can't find any other sources for this claim, and I've looked. If you can find sources other than the study I linked in the OP, I'd really appreciate a link.

Even outside of the possibility that ACE2 may or may not be race specific. If you catch the HIV flu and you're shedding HIV. Basically, everyone will be shedding HIV. Everyone will get the HIV regardless of how well an individual shelters. One day they'll come into contact with an asymptomatic HIV disease bag who doesn't know they're shedding the virus. The whole thing seems basically impossible to avoid.

"Everyone will get the HIV regardless of how well an individual shelters."

This is factually incorrect. It is not unstoppable. There are functional procedures that have been shown to prevent infection, otherwise there wouldn't be a doctor or nurse left in the world that would treat victims.

Treat everyone and yourself as if they were infected, and undertake the necessary procedures to prevent spreading the infection. It's up to us - not our overlords - who survives the pandemic, and the totalitarian aftermath of the oppressive quarantines too.

I guess we shall see what it do, but if a random sneeze or rub of the eyes or touch of the face can give ya HIV. It's just stupid, we'll have to cure HIV.

I think there is a cure: DRACO. It works by finding viral RNA actively being replicated in a cell, and triggering the cell to die. This ends the viral infection. So far it's been tested on more than a dozen RNA viruses and killed them all in vitro. However, a broad spectrum cure for viral diseases is a total destruction of Big Pharma's business model selling vaccines and prescriptions for incurable diseases. They won't fund it, and they also control government funding agencies through graft and corruption, so in vivo testing won't be funded by NIH or CDC either.

Todd Rider has even tried to get crowdfunding to push DRACO further towards approval for public use, but hit the wall. Bill Gates and his buddies don't need funding from other sources to pay for in vivo testing.

I think banksters have the cure. I don't think they're gonna share. I think they want us dead, or sterilized if we live, and better if we have AIDS.

Search DRACO on the duck, or check my backlog for links.

I found some further information outside
of the study with eight participants that
suggest ace-2 is involved.

"If we think of the human body as a house and 2019-nCoV [another name for SARS-CoV-2] as a robber, then ACE2 would be the doorknob of the house's door. Once the S-protein grabs it, the virus can enter the house," Liang Tao, a researcher at Westlake University who was not involved in the new study, said in a statement."

Scientists figure out how new coronavirus breaks into human cells
https://www.livescience.com/how-coronavirus-infects-cells.html

Researchers at Westlake University Unveiled Structure of the RBD-ACE2-B0AT1 Complex
https://en.westlake.edu.cn/news_events/westlakenews/202002/t20200225_3069.shtml

"Structural basis for the recognition of the SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2"
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2020/03/03/science.abb2762

Apparently, ibuprofen might increase ACE-2, so there is some chatter about that being a bad idea.
https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S2213-2600%2820%2930116-8

Yes, the ACE2 receptor is how the virus gets into human cells. But, none of those papers discusses ethnic differences in ACE2 expression, which is what I haven't found any support for, and is what is behind claims it is an ethnically targeted bioweapon. It may be a bioweapon, and I'm more convinced than ever it was at least bioengineered in a lab, but that's not saying it's ethnically targeted.

Dunno if you saw it, but I posted about Shi Zhengli who tinkered with bat SARS-like viruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology by adding the SARS ability to enter human cells with the ACE2 receptor. She also found adding chunks of HIV to them 'interesting'.

I posted about her and her work at WIV recently.

Good finds regarding ACE2 and susceptibility to SARS2.

Thanks!