Traditional Banks Vs. Crypto Companies

Banking systems have been around for centuries. Granted they have been of various types but the purpose they serve has generally remained the same; storing, leveraging and crediting wealth (money) essentially.

Despite being the standard for a significant period of time, these traditional methods are slowly being phased out because of digital infrastructures that are set up to take out the middleman and the distrust that has developed over time from people, with the general feeling of being exploited despite the necessity of the services offered.

Now different banks have acknowledged the varying paths towards Crypto leverage exchanging others are, however, skeptical citing the disruptive potential of cryptocurrency.

Why The Future Of Banks Is Uncertain

👉 Unlike traditional structures where funds are stored in the bank, cryptocurrencies are majorly decentralized where the blockchain allows peer to peer transactions. This basically means they are independent and safe.

👉 In a digitally monetized world, the banks would have no place because the digital currency created by Crypto companies does not need to be held in an organization. Through the blockchain technology, it is all organized in a cloud to your convenience.

👉 Crypto companies could also facilitate faster payments at low rates because of blockchain technology. In the case of loans and credit as well by removing the gatekeeper from the industry the technology provides more security when borrowing money and lower interest rates.

👉 The blockchain technology can also facilitate cross border trade transactions that would otherwise be difficult due to costs related and documentation processes necessary.

👉 The banks are used to a certain kind of stability while digital currencies are unpredictable and unstable. In a digitally monetized world, the banks would not be able to survive and might eventually be forced to shut down.

What’s Left For Banks To Do

Not all hope is lost there is a scenario where the banks could abandon traditional operational strategies and adopt the blockchain technology even in conducting their current businesses.

Otherwise, crypto wallets will gradually replace customary ledgers, and banks will then not be able to conduct money related exchanges.

The banks are generally critical of cryptographic forms of money, which is unfortunate since this could be the new standard, showing reluctance on their part.

Disruption does not happen at once the blockchain technology is still young but with the many real-world applications already available. Those who were reluctant are now coming to understand. Given how these crypto companies have become popular with the young generation. It is only logical to adapt in order to have any relevance because the next generation of financial experts are among these young people and their attitude towards technology is bound to be positive.

It is about time banks realized that they will either be transformed or replaced by technology. Banks will soon have to get on board and have a unified position once they understand that digital money is here to stay and may very soon be the standard.