You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Mathematical Alchemy (dissecting base 10 numbers via Vortex Based Mathematics, the "digital root" and the nonagon)
I think you misunderstood my question. Let me ask this way:
At the beginning of Part 2, is the paths on the nonogon determined by the tuples 1577761274 and 8741315711?
Yes sir, you are indeed correct. In fact, all four (the two you mentioned pointing upward and the other two pointing downward) tuples in that particular / individual diagram determined the path or line segments that were connected within that particular nonagon. I do apologize for my misunderstanding brother.
I was working on another way of expressing these triangles when I realized there is a kind of mistake in your calculations.
When we are doing subtraction, we may find we subtract a larger number from a smaller number. This gives us a negative value with real values.
I would love to express what I have in neatly typed text but Markdown really sucks for Math. No wonder you used images for all of the notation. Mod 9 subtraction works properly by finding some number that makes the other number sum to 9. So, -8 is 1. -5 is 4.
Click here for more
Thank you for your input brother. Mistake perhaps, but it was intentional. I would have went the route you wonderfully explained. However by doing the way I did it, where I broke away from using subtraction / negative integers solely, I went and used addition where appropriate. I then noticed / it still reveled to me an obvious PA-ttern. So much so that I went with this route instead rather than using subtraction / negative integers completely. Good find though brother. Great work. :)