Is Flatland a misconception of the fourth Dimension?
For quite some time I have thought about the book from Edwin Abbott called "Flatland. A Romance of Many Dimensions". The contents of this book are often cited as a heuristic to explain the fourth dimension. However, we cannot see objects disappearing into other Dimensions as Flatlanders -- for example as depicted by the game Miegarkure:
If we cannot observe objects disappearing into another dimension, is something about this heuristic not flawed? I would thank everyone for an answer!
To the question in your title, my Magic 8-Ball says:
Hi! I'm a bot, and this answer was posted automatically. Check this post out for more information.
Flatland was my favorite book at 9, I think the premise if not the math is true. Whatever it is we will see only a portion of its vista
Congratulations @saphircrane! You received a personal award!
Click here to view your Board
Congratulations @saphircrane! You received a personal award!
You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!