A well-known alarmist in this sense who wrote a

"
well-known alarmist in this sense who wrote a lot about the dangers of human nature interference because it can have very serious consequences for society or democracy for teaching human rights so that it can generate new forms of injustice and so on etc. There are really certain risks here but we are now we are talking about the specifics of the philosophical reasons on the shelf and the institutionalization of us. The causality of the thuza lysis is recorded in the fact that by the twentieth century it became completely unclear what a man of mountains zd less Clearly than ever what an action as everything would be good to write in their works more or less Clearly And we already do not have what we know that nature really firstly it is not so different from animals as Kant thought and secondly it turned out that here it is very radical can be applied to it And it's all such a thing is just out of hand slipping away Yes that's what this human nature at the moment is some kind of pluralism does not suit me to some general manager because probably Paustovsky's knowledge Yes of course there is also a competition between different anthropological teachings, and in general it has always been this competition, but now I think we can speak generally in general anthropology and philosophy of science 6 the emergence of the humanities and the connection with the fact that, but I think that after Kant still very few seriously argue on that such a world in itself, even if they take it upon themselves to talk About being it is not to wait for it as to the end And this being is represented in the consciousness of a person in his experiences to be this being of man in the world they are simply being of the world itself it is anthropology of aching omenyala ontology dishes