I am sure I didn't say they were all just, however even the unjust ones are often avoidable and the just ones always are right?

"First of all, You didn't read the article correctly. It says all people arrested suspected of a felony. That means innocent people who are later found not guilty will have their DNA collected."

Uh huh, where did I say differently?

"Yet you believe I should my rights violated and my DNA taken? Is that really what you are saying?"

I am sure I never ever said your rights should be violated.

Which of your rights was violated exactly?
How are you having your rights violated by being identified? Were your rights violated when they took your fingerprints?
What drugs were you convicted of selling?
Congratulations on authoring this article, I enjoyed reading it.