NEW PROOF: British Internet Firm BRAGGED About Manipulating US Elections
A foreign internet firm actually BRAGGED about manipulating US elections. In the pages of Forbes and the Guardian they said they have a near 100% win rate and have manipulated AT LEAST 44 U.S. elections. AND they colluded with the Trump campaign. But Robert Mueller's indictments are a SHAM.
Here's my short segment on this bombshell -
the problem being that if we say it is britain doing this, we have no reason to spend untold dollars on an unnecessary military budget. i know you know this, but damn if it doesn't feel good to say it out loud. love your comedy, love your journalism. stay golden, pony boy.
You nailed it.
I feel like that video of Mueller lying his fucking face off to get us into the illegal, immoral Iraq war should be played alongside every article citing his bogus indictments to justify the bullshit narrative that Russia had ANYTHING to do with Trump getting elected. Maybe we could prevent WWIII...
Totally agree, Katy!
@leecamp do you have links to the articles you referenced in this video?
Yes, I'm working on a written article that will have them all. But you can begin by googling "Cambridge Analytica guardian" or "Cambridge Analytica Forbes" - They have plenty of info to get you started.
Here is text with a link to Forbes article, @dthompson88:
https://steemit.com/news/@lighteye/forbes-finds-trump-election-collusion-proof-at-last
I have already put a text with this story, @leecamp, but I will now add link to your excellent rant :)
I'm looking forward to the Guardian releasing their own documents and methods, on the psychological warfare they employ.
... I still wish I had voted for Trump and hadn't wasted it on Gary Johnson. Cool video, sir!
Your vote doesn't count no matter who you vote for. Only the electoral college's votes count, and the people who get to vote in the electoral college aren't even required to actually vote for the people that the state they represent chose anyway. Your vote wasn't wasted.
Trump won anyway, voting for him wouldn't have made a difference even if your vote did count.
Lol, you're right... I'm just being petty ><
20/20 hindsight...predict what has already happened.
Bogus.
oh shit - an act of war by the British!
an excerpt from the recent Aaron Maté article:
Neoconservative pundit Max Boot decries “the second-worst foreign attack on America,” after 9/11, one that “may be even more corrosive.” According to liberal Jonathan Alter, the Russians have launched “an attack that—but for the loss of life—is as bad as Pearl Harbor.” Democratic Representative Jerrold Nadler concurs, explaining to MSNBC: “They didn’t kill anyone but they’re destroying our democratic process.… Not in the amount of violence, but in the seriousness, it is very much on par.”
Dispassionate, veteran journalists echo the seriousness. “It seems increasingly likely,” writes The Intercept’s James Risen, “that the Russians have pulled off the most consequential covert action operation since Germany put Lenin on a train back to Petrograd in 1917.” “Russia is engaged in a virtual war against the United States through 21st-century tools of disinformation and propaganda,” concludes New York Times chief White House correspondent Peter Baker.
https://www.thenation.com/article/hyping-the-mueller-indictment/
Puppy videos are pretty persuasive, imo.
I remember reading about Cambridge over a year ago and the creepy things they did to our election. It's crazy to watch people who believe this Russia bs, it's so blatantly false. It would be funny if it weren't so scary.