Look, there's no question of entitlement here. Mr. azizbd didn't ask me to write this article, he seems to be just a humble charity worker from Bangladesh with no land or property who wanted to visit the UK, but was denied a visa. So you know he isn't responsible for anything I do. So you can't blame him for "entitlement". And how could you blame me? I have a right to give my opinion about something I see happening. I have a right to comment events, like this guy being denied a visa. I think it was wrong, the UK should have been honored to have this guy visit them. Of course based only on what I know about the situation. So I wanted to bring up this important injustice, you know, people take travelling and visas for granted in our developed countries, but when someone from a country like Bangladesh tries to travel, he runs in to problems like this! It's a genuine problem and would require genuine outrage. Obviously this one post on steem isn't going to do anything about it, but please, articulate what was so morally wrong or reprehensible in my article? I mean the headline describes the happening pretty well. Something scandalous happened, a charity school teacher from Bangladesh was denied a visa because he wasn't considered a "proper visitor". Obviously this was way more scandalous than the whole Trump-Russia election-hacking hoax :D But hey, I get your point, we'll just agree to disagree. I mean at least I didn't do anything illegal, right? I just tried to help a guy out.