Syria: The difference in narratives

In an article by Fox news, they are claiming Syrians supported the attack. With multiple youth coming out in support of further strikes against the Assad regime to stop the "massacre against civilians every day". However, the Syrian news is claiming a different story. People gathered in the street to celebrate the resistance of the US led air strike. They are claiming that the strikes were only in support of ISIS and were not a valid response.
These strikes came without evidence or final information on the investigation into the chemicals used. The video of the incident show no signs of chemical warfare, nor the suffering of people because of one. The only know chemical used according General Mattis is chlorine; a widely used chemical in the region with little ability to identify the origin of creation. There is still no evidence of other chemicals used.

Please take the time to read both sides and make your own conclusions. I also value any feedback or opposing viewpoints.

http://archive.is/2E2To (Fox News article)
http://archive.is/3WT2f (Syrian news article)