Project Veritas releases video 3 - 10/24
The third video from Project Veritas is out! It includes DNC staffers explaining quite clearly where they get their orders from. It is truly amazing how much these idiots like to brag, the only thing funnier is what killed this DNC campaign.
(Interesting note: Youtube displayed a warning I have never seen before when this loaded the first time. It said it is "unlisted" so be careful... it may contain dangerous ideas. In light of this, you may want to watch in in an incognito window so it does not go on your permanent record. )
Project Veritas video 3
Uploaded on Oct 24, 2016
Part III of the undercover Project Veritas Action investigation dives further into the back room dealings of Democratic politics. It exposes prohibited communications between Hillary Clinton’s campaign, the DNC and the non-profit organization Americans United for Change. And, it’s all disguised as a duck. In this video, several Project Veritas Action undercover journalists catch Democracy Partners founder directly implicating Hillary Clinton in FEC violations. “In the end, it was the candidate, Hillary Clinton, the future president of the United States, who wanted ducks on the ground,” says Creamer in one of several exchanges. “So, by God, we would get ducks on the ground.” It is made clear that high-level DNC operative Creamer realized that this direct coordination between Democracy Partners and the campaign would be damning when he said: “Don’t repeat that to anybody.”
The first video explained the dark secrets and the hidden connections and organizations the Clinton campaign uses to incite violence at Trump rallies. The second video exposed a diabolical step-by-step voter fraud strategy discussed by top Democratic operatives and showed one key operative admitting that the Democrats have been rigging elections for fifty years. This latest video takes this investigation even further.
First video:
Second video:
Website: http://projectveritasaction.com/
And for those readers that made it through the video, here is the gif that killed the DNC's birddogging Donald Duck campaign. It just didn't work after this went viral on twitter.
Best reply ever.
Hi! I am a content-detection robot. I found similar content that readers might be interested in:
http://www.eutimes.net/2016/10/creamer-confirms-hillary-clinton-involvement-project-veritas-releases-bombshell-part-3/
Once again your bot is broken.
Including the description with the video that was released by the author should not warrant an attack from your nagbot.
Your current nagbot rules will encourage the posting of videos with no text included. Fix it.
@anyx Flagging instead of responding like an adult, how brave.
Care to explain how encouraging the posting a breaking news youtube video without the original description helps this community?
That was the biggest complaint the first month, "damn people posting youtubes with no description should be banned" was the general sentiment.
Well, which is it @steemcleaners? Just videos with no text or is it ok with the almighty censorship brigade if I include the authors name and description when sharing breaking news and commentary?
Robot did robot thing. You copy pasted. It found copy paste. You flagged me, and whined about 'fixing it', I'm sick of unconstructive whining, so I flagged that response.
Go fight fraud for a day before you tell me how to run MY bot.
How would you know if you get no response for incorrect action? That's the reason it has so many bugs as it sits, because you don't get feedback for fear of being brigaded by you and your hall monitor friends.
You get complaints and flags because your script isn't coded well. Here is a list of your scripts defects just from this nagbotted post.
Your bot detected copypasta from europetimes as original - DEFECT
Your bot did not correctly detect the original youtube description correctly - DEFECT
Your bot ignores the link to the original website and video for description text, and complains as if the source wasn't credited - DEFECT
Your bot has no "post includes quoted paragraphs and provided source links" so it gets a pass. It flags tons of posts that include source\author links, incorrectly. - DEFECT
If people go to the effort to try to link sources and highlight quoted text and still get nagbot messages, it ruins the whole point of your little project and just pisses them off.
Before you get all high and mighty, try to make it work better.