And listening to Crowder, he agrees that NATO is good and has to exist to counter the threat from the outside. What's a crazy proposition is that? What is the raison d'être for NATO to be existing? And what objective it want to achieve today, it's still North Atlantic? doesn't that mean to let NATO reborn is to renew again and again without any effort to reevaluate until it shifts from 'real threat' to 'perceived threat' while also still sacrificing young armies for corporate interest?