So, what can you do?

in #parenting6 years ago

We live in a world where everything is presented to us on a silver-platter. Or at least, we expect it to be. Why wouldn't we? We have other people who do our duties for us and with ever-more-capable machines and artificial intelligence, we pretty much have an app that takes care of all the things we need to do so that we don't have to.

And with so much free time on our hands, you would think we'd use it wisely, to play with our children and educate them. But we don't dare to, because we're afraid. We've been made to think we're not capable to teach our own children.

You can't teach maths to your own off-spring, you need a certified teacher to do that. And how could you teach him the great classics when you don't have an English Lit degree?


brittany-simuangco-596656-unsplash.jpg
Photo by Brittany Simuangco on Unsplash

It might sound funny, to think parents are afraid to educate their own children, but it is often the case. Sure, you can teach them in the first few years of their lives, you can be trusted with basic tasks, but not the important things they teach in schools. Because if you could do it yourself, then we wouldn't need schools anymore, would we? And that's not good for anybody.

But this is all a lie, a veil over your eyes. You are perfectly capable of teaching your child and you know why? Because children are programmed to seek out knowledge. As the psychologist and homeschool-advocate Peter Gray points out,

Sadly, in many cases, the assumption that children are incompetent, irresponsible, and in need of constant direction and supervision becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

It is natural for a child to learn things. As a toddler he learns to walk and talk by imitation, by watching others and that is self-directed. Don't you think it's a bit arrogant that in later years, he may need a third party to tell him what he should and shouldn't learn? Because I do.

No two children are the same and you can't trust a system that treats them as such to know what is best for them. You-the-parent probably know by now what your kid likes and dislikes, whether he'd prefer to kick the ball about in the park or to read indoors. They're different skills and they deserve the same amount of respect. Because kicking the ball about might result into a great sportsman or at the very least, into an adult who leads a healthy life, who exercises. And besides, sports teach children leadership and also teamwork, and thus, they are very valuable for a growing child.
On the other hand, reading helps develop the imagination, it fills the child's head with stories, growing his vocabulary and making him think outside the box. They're both great, yet some kids prefer one over the other.
And you know which it is. Same with school subjects, you can see whether the kid is better with words than with numbers. Well then, why not let them follow their passions? Why not let them concentrate on whichever they prefer? Or perhaps your child doesn't prefer either, but he has an excellent artistic eye. Maybe she brings you little things made out of paper all the time. Perhaps that's where her talent lies, but if you judge all children by the same parameters, some children will feel like failures. Because they can't all be good at the same things, so why should you, as a parent, encourage a flawed system in which only some kids win?

I know what comes next. You're asking 'so what can I do?' and it's an excellent question. What can you do?

1. Support goes a long way


daniel-cheung-554585-unsplash.jpg
Photo by Daniel Cheung on Unsplash

When your child comes to you with something they've made, it's a huge deal for them, even if it may not be for you. Sure, the kid's probably brought you hundreds of drawings by now, and maybe you're a bit bored. Don't be. Do your best to be supportive and to encourage them. Because if they draw so much, chances are there's something there. Passion.

Same with a poem they've written. Maybe it's bad, maybe it doesn't rhyme. But that poem might be a very young JRR Tolkien taking his first steps – do you really want to knock that on the head?
One of the worst things you can do, as a parent, is laugh or down-play your child's achievements. If the child sees you're not that impressed or you find it a bit silly, then they'll get it into their heads that they are bad at drawing or writing or whatever it is.

You might think it's a useless endeavor – why should you encourage drawing? It's just a kid's sketch, after all. It doesn't mean anything. But again, that sketch might turn into a Dali someday. As it happens, Dali's parents encouraged him in his childhood. And I don't know if that pushed him so far, but it sure didn't hurt.

2. Freedom goes even further

gabby-orcutt-74607-unsplash.jpg
Photo by Gabby Orcutt on Unsplash

It's great to support your child, but you should try to make sure you're supporting them in what they want to do rather than what you want them to do. Parents usually have their child's best interest at heart and yet, often end up imposing things (sometimes even whole unwanted career paths) on their kids.
And returning to that Gray quote, if you do that, your child will become weak and dependent on you. If you teach them to work their whole life to please you and make you proud, they will grow up with a skewed sense of self-worth, always judging themselves by your opinion of them.
And I'm sure that's not what we're going for, is it?

No. The goal is to get children interested in their own future, to get them to educate themselves. But in order to do that, they must first be able to find their passions and sometimes, those passions might go against yours. Maybe you want the kid to be an engineer, but she only wants to dance. Then let her dance. You don't have to, of course, and she could well become an engineer, as per your wish. But then, she will spend her whole life on a career path she does not really want and all the goals she will achieve will be to make you happy, instead of her. And that's sad.

A child needs the freedom that comes with knowing Mommy or Daddy won't be angry if I tell them I like dancing or painting or whatever else.

So, what do you do?


alyssa-stevenson-670720-unsplash.jpg
Photo by Alyssa Stevenson on Unsplash

So far, we've established two seemingly contradictory things – that you are capable of educating your child, but also that the child is capable of educating himself. Now, how do we do both things at the same time? How can you be in charge while the child is also in charge?

While kids need freedom and support in finding their interests, they also need help. It's all good and fine if they find what appeals to them, but they will need your physical support and more importantly, your emotional support in pursuing that interest.
And before any of that can happen, they will need you to expose them to life – to show them as many subjects as you can, give them a varied view of life.

A child might have the greatest brain for chess ever, but if that child never plays chess, it's useless. Teach him how to play chess. Or how to swim. Or how to plant trees. Really, who knows what will appeal to your child? You can literally broaden his horizons, something that schools don't really try to do.
You can show him the world, try things, take him to different classes, to museums, libraries, theaters. It's kinda like throwing things at a wall – eventually something will stick.

Anyone know why when I search 'child running' Unsplash assumes I'm looking for attractive blonde women? One of life's mysteries, I suppose...

Cheers for reading,

photojoiner_photo(16).jpeg

Sort:  

I'm certainly not anti-homeschooling, but as a briefly home-schooled kid who married an entirely home-schooled kid, there are two advantages two public school that we didn't get.

Firstly, it's hard to replace the social aspects of school with anything similar. While our parents involved us in clubs and organizations that we were interested in, I found that going to school 5 days a week for 7 hours a day with people who were not interested in the same things gave me a vast experience in understanding and empathizing with people who aren't like me that being in clubs a few hours a week with people who liked the same things didn't. Of course different kids and different skills will get different lessons for the circumstances.
The other is, there's a broad curriculum of science taught in schools, and while many kids in schools don't pick it up, it can be easy to let a kid decide that a subject isn't for them in homeschooling and not get past the crustiness of a new subject. This happened. Luckily adults can learn, too.

Posted using Partiko Android

Public schools and education in the USA has a shady past almost NO one is aware of, mainly as no one is taught to research or look at old books (only what the internet tells us) There was a time in 1860's in usa when they had to use the federal armies to force children into the new public school systems. The more our 'past' gets digitized and the books of old are gone, the 'remaking' of history shall be easier and easier, so sad.

I was home schooled and by a tutor and when my parents or tutor didn't know the thing (drawing, music) we simply had in a student in that field at university level tutor me. It was a good way to learn but not a very common one today, I lived a pretty Victorian sort of childhood.

We can always keep learning too, thanks for reminding of this odd situation in education @honeydue

Yes I kind of agree to you up to a point. You can educate your kid and present him with options to get him inspired. But as many of us know the society was invented for people without aspirations that they are good in practicing small taks. That's why we have schools, banks, jobs and all this system, because some of us even if they are presented with the possibility they will chose not to care about themselves, their future or our future. Maybe is sad in a way, but creativity is hard to be nurtured in individuals that don't see the lack interests and they just want to play a game and eat popcorn :))

Posted using Partiko Android

^flag
!gif popcorn
@popcornexpress

^flag
!gif popcorn
@popcornexpress

^flag
!gif popcorn
@popcornexpress

^flag
!gif popcorn
@popcornexpress

^flag
!gif popcorn
@popcornexpress

^flag
!gif popcorn
@popcornexpress

^flag
!gif popcorn
@popcornexpress

^flag
!gif popcorn
@popcornexpress

^flag
!gif popcorn
@popcornexpress

^flag
!gif popcorn
@popcornexpress

^flag
!gif popcorn
@popcornexpress

^flag
!gif popcorn
@popcornexpress

^flag
!gif popcorn
@popcornexpress

^flag
!gif popcorn
@popcornexpress

This reminds me so much of an article I wrote nearly a month ago where I talked about similar things.

I think what most parents fail to understand is that it's super important to let your child make mistakes. Parents usually have a habit of supervising and leading their children every step of the way, which sounds good, but doesn't allow the children to develop on their own and discover new things and interests.

Experience is a way better teacher than explanation, and that's why it's sometimes better to knowingly let your child make a mistake and let them learn on their own. That said, you obviously shouldn't go too far with it either. If it's something that can seriously harm your child, it's better to warn them beforehand in that case.

Great read! Really enjoyed it :)