You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Ganadores. SLC21-W2 // Elaboración de pasteles clásicos vainilla y chocolate.
Friend, unfortunately we cannot select all the students, that is no longer in our hands, all the students made excellent participations, and we are valuing it. Fortunately, the curator supported almost all the students, and the selection does not depend solely on the evaluation, I think several students have this great confusion in all the courses, they think that just by obtaining a high grade they will be selected, we take into account The fulfillment of the tasks, the demonstration and the effort that the student has has taken into account.
@lirvic I think as for the case of selection that you have just mentioned it does not depend on grades .Does not really sound good .I think @steemcurator01 and @steemcurator02 should clarify us with this . I don’t see any needs of grading students that at the end . it’s not taken into consideration, what the needs of grading students ????.
I think selection should be focused on grades given to students who merit no matter how they received supports from Steemcurator 01 and Steemcurator02people put in so much effort to participate in these learning teaching lessons therefore if the merit a selection by their good’s performance it should given to them .
As for grades I think grading should also be adjusted.No matter how people participate well in a lesson there most be a slides differences in the allocation of marks .If your think avoid grading alot of people with bunches of 10 as grades .It’s will be easy to make the best selection at the end of the week .
There, is no way you can grades more than 10people with 10 and it will be easy to do best selection for the week .Almost all these 10 people with 10 will have high expectations to be amongst the best selected students for the week .Which at the end of the day if they are not selected makes them to feel very disappointed. Discouraging hardwork from students
@lirvic @dasudi - as highlighted by @wirngo you have a problem with your grading.
As mentioned in the @stemmitblog post...
We understand, sir. We will be evaluating this situation to improve and avoid the problem. Thank you for the clarification.
Sir, excuse me, but I will give my honest opinion, this is not about having users with scores between 9 and 10 grouped together, the problem that is occurring is that students get upset when they are not selected, and we are seeing this in different courses, yes They evaluate themselves with a score less than 10, they get upset because they immediately think that they are not going to win, and if they evaluate themselves with a 9-10 and they are not selected, they also get upset because they believe that upon receiving that score they will be selected among the winners, they try not to. Learning is what it seems to me but receiving a vote, and I could understand but what I cannot understand is that they want to be selected at any cost because otherwise they complain by putting our work in between.
But if the problem is due to the score, we will be carrying out a more strict evaluation to avoid inconveniences.
As mentioned in the @stemmitblog post...
Teachers need to focus on making their course not too difficult and as many people as possible can join it. If the course is difficult then very few people will participate in it. It is also important to ensure that grades are given honestly and not with favoritism.
If you design your courses and your grading to give a wider spread of grades you won't have the problem so much.
This observation is valid. I have been thinking same, in as much as the have the final say on winners they should be Fair enough because these learning challenge is not easy .