If you only held one PPY during these 30 days, then your allocation would have been zero PPY due to your portion of the stake being smaller than the minimum precision that can be measured by the blockchain. Note that the first DApp, Helmbet, was not using the main network until the 7th day of the 30 days, so the amounts played were small.
Alternatively, if you held one PPY and the amount played were large enough then you would have received enough to exceed the minimum of 0.00001 PPY. There is no single answer unless you assume a few things.
The short answer is, "No." There is no single answer to this question because it also depends on how much rake was collected during any hour. A larger rake will require a smaller amount to be held by a stakeholder to meet the minimum. I will try to think of a good way to answer your question in the future.
If you only held one PPY during these 30 days, then your allocation would have been zero PPY due to your portion of the stake being smaller than the minimum precision that can be measured by the blockchain. Note that the first DApp, Helmbet, was not using the main network until the 7th day of the 30 days, so the amounts played were small.
Alternatively, if you held one PPY and the amount played were large enough then you would have received enough to exceed the minimum of 0.00001 PPY. There is no single answer unless you assume a few things.
Thank you Taco!
Do you know the minimum about of PPY needed to have obtained a payout (ie to meet the 0.00001 PPY minimum) for November?
The short answer is, "No." There is no single answer to this question because it also depends on how much rake was collected during any hour. A larger rake will require a smaller amount to be held by a stakeholder to meet the minimum. I will try to think of a good way to answer your question in the future.