This is exactly the type of information I've been requesting on the Friday mumble sessions for quite some time now. I didn't articulate my request very well but this is the type of information I was looking for. I don't know whether any of this type of thinking has been published before this post, and if it has, I haven't found it. That's on me if so.

I have been so busy since February I haven't made the time to really dig into this, so I am very appreciative of your efforts here @taconator. I'm also disappointed there are no responses or suggestions to this line of thought.

I would be shocked if these ideas have not already been thoroughly thought of and discussed by Jonathon & the PeerPlays team. I do NOT believe that is the case. We've all been quite busy lately, and I'm certain that's especially true of the PeerPlays team as they have been preparing for the launch of their service.

However this is a very important topic that directly relates to "Provably fair gaming", so explicit rules and procedures need to be well thought out, explained and available to witnesses as well as the public. With the debut of PeerPlays gaming only a few short weeks away expectations and standards need to be in place so when gaming starts confidence will be high concerning the reliability of these event oracles.

If there are other definitive sources for this type of info it would be good to publish a link to them here. I look forward to seeing how these standards will be established for various sporting events as PeerPlays goes live.