You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: There Are No Absolute Truths (Part 2)
I am not up to a debate. I am having enough troubles talking about the untruths in science, and those are just facts.
You just poo-poo'd one absolute truth, and didn't even recognize it.
So, a thing, that you probably can grock, but isn't an absolute truth, but is one from a human perspective. (as in being a human)
Killing someone hurts your soul. It may be socially acceptable or inacceptable. Good or bad. But your soul is still hurt.
If you weren't you wouldn't bother commenting. So more or less you did in order to undermine what I wrote, yet, providing no ground for your assertions.
I didn't. Whatever I say is a relative truth. That's the whole point. Even if what I am saying is relative, it doesn't make your premise absolute. It just means that it exists in a relative realm as much as mine.
It wouldn't if that someone was trying to kill your baby or if you were under drugs, or lived during the 5th century under an oppressive ruler that forced you to against him.
again. relative.
It hurts your soul. Just like a bullet hurts your body. To me it is a plain, obvious fact. I watch it happen. You can learn to see it too. It doesn't matter if you killed someone for a good reason or not. Usually a good person, defending their home, shoots a thief. These people often show emotional distress over the event. (Just one manifestation of the hurt to your soul)
As you seek, so shall yee find - is an absolute truth.
It is based on laws of the universe.
You haven't always felt this way. So either you killed someone and you feel this way now or after 100 people you might even feel better.
again. not an absolute truth.
What are you going on about?
If someone has a bullet, that went ripping through their flesh, turning them into a bloody mess, do you say, that person was not hurt by the bullet?
not if they are a masochist enjoying the pain and blood. (exception but does exist)
You are correct, I shouldn't have even started.
I asked you if the person was hurt.
I didn't ask about feelings, or emotions.
I asked if the person was hurt.
If you can say that the person, lying there a bloody mess is not hurt, then I don't have anything to say to your further.
In this same way, I see people hurting their soul (energy body). After killing someone, their soul is lying there in a bloody mess.
And it should be healed. But, people like you just say that we should ignore it because it doesn't really exist.
if they are taking pleasure from it then they are not hurt. We see people that go through acupuncture. They get needles in their bodies (get hurt) but believe that the overall effect is positive.
That's poetry. not objective truth.
I didn't say that. you do.
Well, you just said it. Twice.
How do you explain color to a blind man?
You can't, so I will stop here.
I will give you some very important advice.
You are arguing from a nihilistic stance.
There are two ways this ends. With the nihilist destroying themselves.
Or them coming to the realisation that there is absolute truths.
Be well on your Journey