This is proof that I'm being targeted under the excuse that I was voted by a whale.
I love this fear campaign because that's how people get strong to fight for freedom.
So Steemians have to be silenced if they are being used as a guinea pigs.
You have shown how power is arbitrary in Steemit.
Why don't whales attack their enemies directly?. Why use innocent bystanders for a war in the fight for power?
So go ahead and downvote all the posts, just to see if nobody in power or on Steemit is opposing.
On Steemit Power view anyone can make a post and initiate any kind of experiment using other as simple stones.
And my direct answers are finished, because I don't like to talk to people in a room of inequality where they have a sword and want to call it a dialogue.
One more time I will quote here:
contradictory philosophical problems on Steemit I would like to clarify all the possible strategies for change that can be used or are already happening all mixed and in collusion:

a) - Cooperative strategy: based on consensus where everybody has power to participate and have influence in collective decision, signs of an equalitarian society
b) - Destructive strategy: control self-interested groups inducind chaos or manipulation by trying to control the collective resources pool or creating proposals that affect the flow of resources, vision, and mission of the network, signs of a dissolving society
c) - Hierarchic or Oligarchic strategy: propositions for change of the community by 1% of power owners of organizations inside and outside the community and characteristic of a hierarchic society.

So I think problems can be solved only with strategy a)- based in cooperation and collaboration based in consensus, but maybe there are already working strategies b) and c) can can leave to the dissolution of the community, that have a reason to resist and fight this kind of behaviors.