You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Government as a Service; A new perspective on Governments and taking the best of the two worlds of Anarchy and Minarchy

in #philosophy7 years ago

Thanks for the answer @vimukthi, I kind of like your John Wick solution, it is outside the box, buying services for every kind of need. But you are saying that there wont be enough resources around to help poor people buying this service and instead we should pay a flat tax instead, right?

I tend to vomit when I hear the word government, so im very anti to that by nature. However, we will still have cities in the future, although, I do think we will decentralize in this area as well, there will be no need for 20 million people cities when we have 3d printers around and where most people can work from home. What Im trying to say, there will most likely be a demand for courts/police/firemen etc but Im not sure about the the "ownership" of these services and if they should be labeled "government" who should run these things and how should they be elected (if at all).

Sort:  

In a state as a service system, government would be an entrepreneurial venture like EOS, Ethereum, Komodo, Enigma or like a shopping mall. They can be run using any methods and the best methods will win. EOS and ENG are both great but different smart contract platforms I think they will both triumph over the not so good ETH and it will be a natural selection.

Also see my response to @ilt-yodith