Yeah, I thought so too, for many years, but that was 2 of your lifetimes ago.

Having done Atheism and the science, the biology, the cosmology, the theoretical physics, Humanism and Trans-humanism, and having put some serious effort into circumspect religious investigation, I can say with certainty, that from a scientific and empirical standpoint, I believe Atheism and what it is based on, requires far more imaginative scenarios and assumptions and is far more prolifically proven wrong, by it's own admission than Theism and the evidence for Theism outstrips Atheism by multiples.

Theistic tenets in fact are proving correct, the more we discover through empirical scientific investigation, while the scientific community actually asserts that the majority of its 'knowledge ' will be outdated and proven false within a relatively short time, as it has been at a geometrically increasing rate over the past half century at least.

A major problem with Atheism appears to be closed mind thinking, which is exactly what Atheism claims about Theism.

Well I am certain that many closed minded Theist suddenly realise the folly of their perceptions and turned to Atheism without due diligence.

I believe I have been diligent in my investigation and never turn down an opportunity to learn from like Theists, opposing Theists, Atheists and Agnostics. MiIlitant Atheists are another story and while they are the most important to reason with, I find them the most unreasonable.