RE: Free to fail: Upside and Consequences
Its an interesting mix for me. I enjoy "law" because it often cuts down on the amount of people you have to kill to secure your being, but then law in itself is only as good as those who inforce it. Also laws don't really work because murder is illegal yet people still get murdered as you point out, so I put no real faith in it, its just a man made thing.
I am a big fan of freedom, in a world of common sense there would be no law needed. I don't need a law to tell me its not cool to steal from you and no law has ever stopped me from doing something I wanted to do. Laws take effect only if you get caught.
Now in general I like some "free zones" since pretty much everything is regulated and often with many flaws since people are imperfect no rule set is perfect. I shy away from most laws and regulations since I view them as last resort type things that really only work in select cases and impede things, but do see the "need". I like some areas to be "danger anything that happens in here is your fault if you enter cause its not a safe zone" I would love that concept in many areas where possible, I think you can learn a lot in such places and if you don't like the idea don't enter.
In crypto if all of it dropped to zero as I type this i would still have profited and it is impossible for me to "lose" and my crypto philosophy will always remain as such. I do not like when people enter a zone with no "rules" then cry cause they got stomped.
To quote DMX "always know the rules of the game before you play it"