RE: Sunrise on goat ( ↩️ Resteem ▶️ $0.5 👍)
First of all, noticed you revenge flagged my non-bid botted post. That was nice of you.
Do you understand the purpose of a flag? It is about the content and not intended to be used in a vindictive fashion as you have.
I flagged because I saw subpar and questionable content with a lot of paid votes. Furthermore, you are using others to spread the content using the expectation that they would get something out of it rather than content spread organically like it should.
If you have more 50,000 Steem power, will you Upvote a lot of posts for 1 week except your posts? And wii you share the rewards?
I do this already with much less SP. The only reason I have any self-votes at all is because of the anti-abuse curation trail and thankfully they are only 37%. I often share liquid rewards with flaggers on abuse.
Posted using Partiko Android
OK, First of all, I apologized revenge flagging and canceled it. But, I don't agree with you below paragraph.
The objective of Resteem compensation has a reason.
Anyone who has a few of Steem power and Resteemd my post are able to receive $0.5 Upvoting. You can track my previous posts. A lot of Steemians who has a few of Steem power(Actually, It doesn't matter how many Steem power they have) were already got their posts Upvoted.
At least, I don't self-Upvote a lot like you. I think I'm contributing a lot of Steemians rather than you. Many Steemians want to get their posts Upvoted. You can check their reaction on any posts. Actually, They said Thank you.
Please, Don't distort my objective before you know in details.
Alright, maybe we got off on the wrong foot so going to try again.
Maybe your motives / intentions are actually good and perhaps my real issue is your method or how you are going about it.
I have been a vocal critic against using bid bots for many reasons but one of my biggest is they promote the thing they call shit posting. Not saying that is what this post is but giving them your business gives them more power and I am against them. I may be ok with non-profit bots with high quality standards like @ocdb but most bid bots I have found support a significant amount of abuse. It is what it is.
My second issue is the resteem thing as I find it to be gimmicky. It's easy to get plankton to do what you want when you are offering something but I think it would help Steem if we had more honest curators. Not those that vote or resteem because they want something but rather because they believe in the substance of the content.
As I said, my self-votes are not intentional as they are done via steemauto. I would disable the self vote on the trail in a second once that feature is available but I like following the trail to support the anti-abuse community.
Perhaps, we have similar goals in regard to community but maybe we just disagree on the way to achieve them. That's ok. We are able to agree to disagree if that is the case.
Posted using Partiko Android
Interesting point, I'm also wondering about the ethical standard of the bitbot programme here on Steemit. It seems to be unfair. But I'm not fully informed, just an instinctive initial opinion.
You're not wrong but that's just my opinion. ;)
I've wrote about this matter in many occasions but the powers that be don't want to put away their geese laying golden eggs, if course and their users don't mind contributing to the centralization of power as long as they can get their Trending spot.
Posted using Partiko Android
Good to hear your comment and opinion Anthony. Well it seems we can still make some progress without the centralization occurring in steemit.