Are these photos you took? If so great job. If not please give proper credit.
Pretty F**Ked up stuff I'm seeing here.. It is however art so I gotta respect that.
Something uneasy about the second picture for me. Violence on women of a sexual nature makes my very core anger. You should also probably include NSFW tag on this as well at least one of these picture has some pretty questionable content from some employers standards.
Edit: Hey man sorry but I'm temporary flagging you until you add NSFW in the tags or title please.
I found the photos interesting, hadn't heard of this place before.
Can't upvote you though sorry, even though I don't agree with @klye's flagging here either. Heres my reasoning
Positive:
Well taken photos of a unique place I hadn't personally seen. ++
Exif data shows all of the photos taken by the same camera, same time
Not found elsewhere on interwebs.
Tagged nsfw (eventually) for the gore depiction.
Negative:
No article text .
No links for further information for the park, where it is, what it depicts.
I'm trying to be a good curator here, I can't vote for this but I don't believe it should be flagged either @klye now that its tagged properly..
Are these photos you took? If so great job. If not please give proper credit.
Pretty F**Ked up stuff I'm seeing here.. It is however art so I gotta respect that.
Something uneasy about the second picture for me. Violence on women of a sexual nature makes my very core anger. You should also probably include NSFW tag on this as well at least one of these picture has some pretty questionable content from some employers standards.
Edit: Hey man sorry but I'm temporary flagging you until you add NSFW in the tags or title please.
done
I took this photos and this is art. it's park - public place with free entry. so it's basically does not need to censor
Thank you. Sorry I missed your reply earlier normally my dinger goes off and I go check.
My apologies. Some pretty wild pictures here. If it's got tits, dicks or gore generally an NSFW is warranted for future reference. :)
poke nsfw tag was added dont forget to unflag bro :)
Ah thanks for the ding. Sorry!
I found the photos interesting, hadn't heard of this place before.
Can't upvote you though sorry, even though I don't agree with @klye's flagging here either. Heres my reasoning
Positive:
Well taken photos of a unique place I hadn't personally seen. ++
Exif data shows all of the photos taken by the same camera, same time
Not found elsewhere on interwebs.
Tagged nsfw (eventually) for the gore depiction.
Negative:
No article text .
No links for further information for the park, where it is, what it depicts.
I'm trying to be a good curator here, I can't vote for this but I don't believe it should be flagged either @klye now that its tagged properly..