I love WP that in their attempt to "debunk" the Monica Peterson / Haiti stories has been forced to give out a heap more information and draw more attention - PLUS show their bias again (They're owned by a major HRC donator)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/12/06/another-false-pizzagate-tale-the-death-of-a-sex-worker-activist-in-haiti/

Comments from here : https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5grwhp/washington_post_covers_death_of_monica_petersen/

The author fails to mention this post she made were she specifies that she believes there is human trafficking occurring in the "Clinton's Caracol Complex". The author leaves this post out of his article, but includes a more sedate post she made about Clinton. Because the two posts are linked side by side in almost every context I've seen them in, I have to believe he's seen and read the first post in his research and this is a blatant attempt to deceive his readers. Without the first post, it looks like wild conjecture that she was researching a link between human trafficking and Clinton, which is what this article attempts to portray it as.

Also the key "friend" that this article continuously cites to back up their claim Petersen was not investigating Clinton, is a Denver based dominatrix. Not exactly a solid witness to the the professional pursuits Ms. Petersen might have had in Haiti.

And still the U.S State Department has not made an official claim about her death. To my knowledge this is the first mainstream publication that has covered her death at all, and the only reason for it to exist is to further discredit "fake news". Something is strange here.