You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Regarding Plagiarism and Intellectual Property
If you want the rights, you have to purchase them separately.
That is an intangible derivative of the physical world reality. If I purchased the artwork, it is now my property. What you are describing would be more akin to 'renting' the artwork. I am well aware that copyright law contradicts what I am saying. My point is that copyright law falls apart under logical examination. There is no such thing as 'intellectual property'. This is why intellectual property is so difficult to define and IP law has become so convoluted as a result. It requires one to engage in logical acrobatics.
Actually, it requires an acceptance of the rights of others. At this point I'm going to leave you to live in your contrived reality and return to actual reality.
Well if you're going to resort to making insulting insinuations:
But, if you ever decide to poke your head out from your intellectual blanket fort again, you ought to explore the concept of negative vs. positive rights. There are some great essays on the subject.