RE: The reason
A precise number is actually pretty hard to get to, because payout values of rshares change over time. However, we can identify with precision exactly how many rshares have been delivered and provide an approximate range of how much STEEM that would be at current values.
You have received 48876374025798 rshares. That's a range of 72-144 STEEM in rewards before curation, depending on where each post ends up on Convergent Linear Rewards Curve. Based on your average unit age, at least half was delivered before HF21 when there was no CLRC range and curation was a lower cut. I would estimate your after payout rewards from SBI to be between 72 and 108 STEEM.
Whether that's 'in the green' depends on how you value your units on an ongoing basis. There is a thin OTC market for units (since they are transferable above 25 unit minimum) that is valuing units between 0.45 and 0.50. That would make your current value (units at mark-to-market plus rewards already received) somewhere in 218.7 to 271 range. Unless I miscounted, you have spent 224 STEEM on sponsoring and the rest were sponsored. That means at low end of range you are almost in the green and at high end you are in the green.
Thanks. I'd say I'm doing alright and if I never invested again into @SBI, then I will definitely be in the green and the small amount of steem I paid will have come back to me. Sounds good to me.
Maybe you will take the time to explain to @mmmmkkkk311 how much of a return on his investment he will make? - Oh shit, forgot. He has only been given @sbi. Doesn't that put him in the green? Maybe my math is off.
Thanks for taking the time to go through all of this. My support is still with @sbi project until convinced otherwise.
It would put him in the green, except that we blacklist accounts that downvote us. We do not engage in retaliatory downvotes, but why would we upvote somebody that is downvoting us?
So, what you are saying is that you have a blacklist and you are not mindlessly upvoting people's content? Holy shit! What a brilliant idea.
Doesn't this go against what @mmmmkkkk311 claims is happening? Someone needs to read and get involved before they make ASSumptions and aren't able to produce evidence for what they ASSume.
p.s. sorry @mmmmkkkk311, you won't be getting that free money I sent to you because of your attitude. So sad. I worked hard for that and was willing to give the little that I had. Maybe, just maybe, if your attitude changes, you'll get that free money.
This very basic information is included in the FAQ! If somebody wants to make an informed opinion that would be the place to start.
#sbi-skip
Well, would you look at that! All the issues this crazy dude has brought up are being or have been addressed. If someone would do just a little bit of research... hint, hint
Did you notice that as soon as I resteemed his post he realized that the discussion here makes him look really bad, so he republished and shifted the discussion so new readers don't see the whole thing?
@josephsavage, yes and I knowtice that his behavior makes him less credible and untrustworthy. I'm still waiting on the evidence against you and @sbi as a whole - still, nothing that hasn't been easily addressed. Makes you, @josephsavage, look better in my eyes and him just some dude who only cares about himself and no one else (what trauma has he gone through or is he a psychopath?). The one thing that remains to be seen is if you, when/if steem jumps in price, take the money and run. But, I was thinking about this and this would be really stupid because you would be destroying your long-term cash flow for a quick buck. So, hey, for now, you have my backing until your character is proven to be as he fears.
Thanks for your support.
#sbi-skip