You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Only a statist would object to dissolving the federal government
Video won't play on my end. Not sure about everyone else. But as per the title (I am guessing this is sort of an attention grabber, and not your real sentiment?) I would like to pose a question or two:
If someone proposes murdering everyone in DC--men, women, and children--to "dissolve the fed," and someone is opposed to that, are they, as per the reasoning in the title, automatically a "statist"?
What if, in a much less extreme case, for some other reason, someone opposes your particular approach/platform for dissolution? Are they automatically a "statist"?
No, this is a direct title. But what does murdering people have to do with dissolving the fed?!? If you're suggesting that killing people is ok, you might not be a statist, but you're definitely not a libertarian!
Not what I was saying at all, and you know this, but am not surprised by response.
hey. How's the weather today in Japan? Any anarcho activity in Tokyo? Osaka? Let us all know.
Weather's great. Can only watch it on TV though from the Zionazi bunker!
not the case, fuzzyPillowBoy. It appears quite obvious you can do lots of damage to AK's efforts from your "bunker" (regardless of your motivation).
Oh, the irony of what has transpired this past 24 hours. AK might have actually made the case on an empirical level which you and Rose (and I think D. Broze) have been putting forth... and which interestingly enough, Jeff Berwick rebuked.
stupid, pompous anarchos. all over the map. No wonder the lovely Lauren Southern gets noticeably ill around y'all.
It's a valid question. I have no desire to try and dissolve the federal government, and a president doesn't even have that power. Am I a statist too?