RE: Only a statist would object to dissolving the federal government
That's not how it works. You have to have a reasonably sound platform, he needs to sit down and write down the steps he will take as president. He can't dissolve himself because once he does the system in place can automatically replace him. He has to start with dissolving congress, set up the new monetary system which will allow him to pay for the dissolution, start with calling the military back to prevent anarchy by allowing states to set up defenses against opposition and any thoughts by foreign governments of intervention/invasion during the transition, list the departments that can immediately be dissolved, name the ones like the VA and SS that will be integrated into the new monetary system and if those programs will slowly be dissolved overtime until those people are deceased....with the last objective of turning the lights out at the white house dissolving the presidency. He can't just stand up there and ramble off stuff off the top of his head without a laid out plan that becomes null and void as soon as he dissolves himself with congress still intact. Then maybe someone will take him seriously otherwise those within the Libertarian party are going to vote for someone else as their candidate.
AK and Judge Andrew Napolitano can hash out the details. RELAX, fool. It's only 2018. Plus we have Patrick Smith for Governor, acting as an Adam Klone in Texas, so we can see how the independent minded folks of the Lone Star, respond to him in the next few months... and play our hand by what we learned, hence.
S F W? So he runs NPA - No Party Affiliation in 2020. We'll know whether or not the LP will "Weld" us again by the delgate count lined up in '19. Plenty of time to organize the data base attained from distributing "Freedom!" all over the map in the next 18-24 mos.
Adam's only real competition would come from Rand Paul jumping from the GOP ship... perhaps Justin Amash or Thomas Massie... or from pure celeb standpoint, John Stossell along with his sidekick, Kennedy" throwing their hats in the ring. Perhaps Judge Nap. Otherwise, WHO are you thinking could steal the nomination from AK?
There's some within the party who are starting a funding campaign to bring focus to a women named Laura Ebke, she is a Libertarian state senator for Nebraska, so I am assuming they like the fact she brings some government experience into the game, Justine Amash they claim would probably win 95% of the convention nomination if he jumped over to the Libertarian ticket, a guy name Larry Sharpe from NY is another they are watching as a potential but he's currently running for office in NY so that may conflict with running on the presidential ticket for the Libertarians...but if he wins it's definitely someone they want to look at in the future....I think because he would bring with him more minorities into the party, other names they are excited about are Jesse Ventura, probably because he has experience and exposure on a national level, and two other guys, Bill Weld and Austin Peterson....Johnson said he'd not interested in another run.
Bring it, bitch!!!! None of them have Adam's "Split 50!" campaign insight. ...not to say any of them can't pilfer it, if they so choose. Adam just needs to continue what he started with his "Big Easy" book distribution act and no one will touch him. Amash isn't going to jump ship. He's got it too good in the GOP. And believe me, he doesn't want to be forced to deal with some of the LP baggage; he is a Constitutionalist... which does leave room for Prohibtions here and there. And taxation.
Again, Adam's only threat would come from a combo of John Stossel and Kennedy. Jesse Ventura is not a libertarian. Adam and he have a debate on YT. Pretty good action, actually.
But keep playing. Sooner or later you might come up with your magic bullet.
None of it's worth getting that excited over.
oh, but it is................................................................