You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Corruption On STEEM : What Do You Do?
It's hard to call it corruption when there cannot be a security force against it because STEEMIT is supposed to be non-regulated.
It's hard to call it corruption when there cannot be a security force against it because STEEMIT is supposed to be non-regulated.
What about peer regulated vs self-regulating (ai) ... let's see what changes Steemit makes as it evolves. It sure is very interesting times to be living in ... HODL! Peace out!
It will be interesting to see if/when STEEM migrates to the EOS platform as there is going to be an enhanced governance model there.
Peer-regulated = downvote. Is it working?
And another thing I noted is that people seem "sheisty" when it comes to up-voting comments. Even if they are small and add the slightest amount to the topic at hand, a comment should get at least an "auto-upvote" if we go with the "self-regulating ai" approach. In the end I think it should be a mix of both ...
Whatever action will be taken, must be through community agreement, not individuals or an AI. That is the logic of Steemit.
Alright. Cheers to that. I can get behind that. Thanks for the chat. And in regards to these fish analogies ... I don't think I am a red fish and definitely not a whale. Feeling disappointed with things like up-vote aggregates using accounts to curate and earn coin. Makes this whole experience seem shallow and watered down. Anyhow, maybe I'm being too much of a critic now ...