A few thoughts and some questions for clarification. It was my understanding that the downvote was to be used for poor quality content. When I saw how much time and effort it appears was put into this post, I admit I was surprised and confused by your choice. Reading through your explanation am I correct in concluding your intention was to put some of the rewards back in the pool to make it possible for more authors to benefit? If so, how much would you say was fair for this post, as in what amount would you have allowed it to make before making the decision to downvote? I'm still new enough that there are many people I've yet to come across, this is the first post I've ever seen by krnl, but again if I understood correctly, you're saying he often writes long essay posts that earn a great deal? As in, if this was not reoccurring you would not have chosen to downvote it?
Also, what type of material would you consider beneficial for increasing the traffic to steemit? (I am working on my pitch for a number of talented/creative friends therefore it's important that I know whether or not they will be well-received)
I'm actually thinking of @nonameslefttouse when posing this next question: You mentioned subjective a couple of times, are you able to be objective about my previous question, i.e. can you recognize what types of material and entertainment would draw a broader audience here whether or not you personally like it?