Food deprivation as a popular technique used by mind-control programmers (Chapter 2.11)
Food is a primary human need — as per Abraham Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Therefore, manipulation of a supply of food is a powerful method of trauma-based mind-control. Food may be withheld from children who are being abused and/or programmed, while on other occasions food is force-fed.
Deprivation of food causes changes in the human body. These effects include the obvious: Weakness; fatigue; disorientation and death. But also include the occult (or 'hidden') effects of withholding food, such as: Increased predisposition to programming; susceptibility to suggestion; and entering non-ordinary states of consciousness. Withholding food is, for these reasons, a popular abuse perpetrated by mind-control programmers.
The Master Psychologists, and their foot-soldiers, use overt food deprivation, and (more covertly) nutritional deprivation, to weaken the psychological defences of those they are programming. As with many of the other conditioning techniques described in this book, food and nutritional deprivation takes place both on a visible, societal level, and on a hidden (or ‘occult’) level.
In this section, first we will look at the ways in which food supply and restriction is used to control people within wider society. Then we will describe the ways in which food is used within trauma-based conditioning systems as an adjunct to other methods of programming.
Food and control in society
Many books could be written — and indeed have been — on the ways in which food, and the food industry, manipulate human consciousness.
We anticipate that this section may be very difficult for any readers who have not consciously explored the social context into which they were born. Planet Earth in the early 21st Century is subject to significant mind-control and so, here, we run into a problem of normalization, and of cognitive dissonance. However, we feel it is essential to understand overt abuses in the visible food-supply on Earth before it is then possible to grapple with the hidden (or ‘occult’) abuses.
Just as a slave owner in the Deep South of America would have baulked at the idea that keeping slaves was wrong — after all, his neighbours were doing it, and he grew up with slaves all around him — we recognize that many readers will struggle to recognize that something equally hostile, and equally normalized, is taking place all around them in their so-called ‘modern’ society. We are, of course, referring to the industrialized killing of animals in concentration-camps across the planet. We are also referring to the practice of keeping cows in a constant state of pregnancy and the forcible removal of their growth hormones (milk) which is then sold to a different species (humans) for consumption. We appreciate that many readers may not have de-conditioned themselves from the programming of their ‘cult’ure to the point of accepting this bizarre reality, and the above paragraph will have triggered many programmed routines to prevent your acceptance. This is to be expected.
Because of the extent of trans-global conditioning on the topic of food, it is difficult to know how to begin to unravel the scale of the problem with the food-supply on Earth.
This situation is similar to how it was seemingly an impossible task to explain to slave-owners that their actions were having a negative impact on humanity. In the end, the public had to pay-off slave owners. It was, sadly, impossible to reverse the programming they had received as children. In the end, their programming had to be accepted as permanent, and bribes issued to prevent the behaviour. The same may be necessary for the meat industry and some of those who support it.
In addition to this primary problem with the Earth’s food supply, there are additional ways in which the Master Psychologists have engineered a global system of food-deprivation. This is done by creating an invisible form of malnutrition. This type of malnutrition relies on heavily processed foods and an industrial push towards sugar-heavy foods. This weakens the human biocomputer and are just two additional ways in which emerging human consciousness is suppressed and awareness is weakened.
In short: A well-nourished society is less susceptible to mind-control, and poses a threat to existing power-structures. Just as the British starved the Irish to engender compliance and an inability to fight back, so too do interlocking global networks of food-conglomerates, and their institutional guardians, perpetuate a state of malnutrition in populations. Often, this malnutrition is the opposite of the traditional perception of starvation: The victims of it are more likely to become obese than emaciated, but the end result is the same: Passivity, compliance, disorientation, poor resistance to mind-control, and high-susceptibility to the demands of authority.
Today, the practice of food-deprivation for power and control is evidenced by the British Crown’s depriving the lower castes of food via their disciplinary wing (the British ‘government’). These castes are required to use ‘food banks’ to obtain food. This is food they cannot otherwise acquire on account of the imbalance of wealth engineered by those, elsewhere in the country, sat in palaces and government buildings.
Food deprivation may also be used, on a microcosmic level, within a ‘family’ system to control children. Children may be deprived of food as ‘punishment’ and, on other occasions, force-fed any food they resist eating. These scenarios are, sometimes, not specifically about food, but represent part of a broader pattern of behaviour in which a ‘parent’ subjects the child to a range of other controls.
Often, a ‘parent’ on Earth can be observed in the process of unconsciously programming a child just as the parent themselves were programmed. Having no conscious recollection of their own childhood, the parent blindly acts-out a range of ‘socialization’ programming routines installed by their ‘cult’ure. In such cases, this control of the child’s food-intake is simply a pretext under which to further break the child’s sense of independence and self-volition. This is, obviously, because these qualities of self-certainty and confidence, if nurtured, could pose a threat to existing power-structures in the society.
Just as the Crown (‘royal’ or ‘presidential’) must deprive the lower-castes of food (or food of nutritional value), so too must the microcosm of the ‘crown’ in the family homes of the kingdom act out the same performance.
This is the inherent nature of power hierarchies: Each layer in the hierarchy is a fractal of (or ‘self-similar’ to) the whole. In other words: A monarchy can only sustain itself if it appoints smaller monarchs throughout its infrastructure. And so, for a society to tolerate Monarchy (whether ‘royal’ or ‘presidential’) it must be blind to the abuse of the Monarch. The society, therefore, sustains this blindness by encouraging monarchial behaviour at a lower-level within family homes and other substructures. Power therefore sustains itself, to some extent, by conferring power elsewhere and normalizing such abusive power-relations throughout the fabric of a ‘cult’ure. In this way, power disguises itself as a ‘natural order’. By encouraging societal pervasiveness of its abuses, power creates the illusion of normality in its own behaviour.
This is one reason why the ‘family’ and its power hierarchy of parent-child is sacrosanct in monarchial societies. It is because, to question the power hierarchy in the family system is, by proxy, to question it in the monarchy or presidency. Seriously deconstructing the ‘family’, and its inherent abuses of claimed ‘authority’ (see Chapter 5.6) would pose a serious threat to the plausible continuation of that society’s entire caste system. Hence, a politician’s constant emphasis of on ‘family values’ is actually a plea to the people to accept, and believe in, hierarchy and authority. For, without this sustained belief by the people, the politician’s halls and palaces would crumble in implausibility.
Food deprivation as a catalyst for mind control
Food deprivation is often used by occult groups in conjunction with other mind-control conditioning protocols. Food deprivation induces a series of severe neurobiological shifts in human consciousness, rendering a victim more susceptible to conditioning.
The practice of food deprivation in occult groups is an extremely common adjunct to other methods of torture and abuse used to split and compartmentalize experience in a child. Put simply: Food deprivation is a catalyst to other ritual abuses. It further pushes a person into a state of consciousness where they are less-defended against psychological attack.
Typically, those groups who abuse and psychologically condition children in isolated locations (adventure holiday camps; scout camps etc.) will target children for prolonged food deprivation over many days. This food deprivation has the same effect that such practices had on those victims held in British and German concentration camps — and these practices are well researched by Master Psychologists in monarchial power systems.
It is well-established that human beings become desperate and disorientated when deprived of food. For this reason, food deprivation is typically used, together with the other techniques described in this book, during prolonged conditioning rituals in occult groups.
You can read the next section here.
Previously published sections:
Chapter 1
1.0 Our village is sick
1.1 What is Mind control?
1.2 Engineered Ignorance of the Occult
1.3 The History of Mind Control
2.0, 2.1 Splitting and Spinning
2.2 Near-drowning
2.3 Live burials
2.4 Use of animals and insects
2.5 Association of creativity with pain
2.6 Use of electric shocks as a programming method
2.7 Ritual Murders and their Meaning
2.8 (Part I) Sexual morality, violence, and Power
2.8 (Part II) Sexual morality, violence, and Power
2.9 (Part I) Ritual abuse of babies and infanticide
2.9 (Part II) Ritual abuse of babies and infanticide
2.10 Masks and costumes as common features in trauma-based conditioning
NOTE:
If you are reading this sometime in the distant future, please be aware that this is a draft chapter section from the book Secret Doors, Hidden Rooms: Understanding and Deprogramming Trauma-Based Mind-Control systems which may now be available as a complete and finished book. It will contain much more detail and an updated text. Try searching for it online.
You mean like McDs?
@builderofcastles. Thanks for reading!
I feel that's one aspect of it, yes. A McD-type fast-food industry subsidized by power is problematic, and there are lots of other angles to this, like how "People who live in poorer neighborhoods in the U.S. are less likely to have easy access to supermarkets carrying a wide variety of fresh produce and other healthy food" https://www.reuters.com/article/us-access-healthy-idustre50k5nw20090121
Then there is the issue of what children are fed in 'schools' and 'prisoners' are fed in 'prison'. For example, "Nationally, much of prison food is outsourced to two large private corporations, Aramark Correctional Services and Trinity Services Group, the targets of increasing numbers of inmate grievances and embarrassing lawsuits. While under contract with Aramark, for example, kitchens in Michigan and Ohio prisons reportedly “served food tainted by maggots… rotten meat… food pulled from the garbage…[and] food on which rats nibbled.”" https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2017/03/03/prison-food/
You've made me realize I could write a lot more on this topic. Manipulating the supply of food (and its nutritional value) is extremely significant as a covert method by which power retains its hierarchies.
There is nothing stopping you from making another post
... or another
... or another
^_^
Curated for #informationwar (by @wakeupnd)
Ways you can help the @informationwar!