RE: My Face Is Now On Amazon Prime For The Award Winning Best Documentary "Big Secret"!
If I can intrude on you big guy, I have had the pleasure of your click on a previous occasion. I arrived with bad timing for the flag war between yourself and another. Time and circumstance can both be tutors.
I would like to share with you a view of bots, My own personal opinion.
On a moral stance, I would say this is the same thing which happens in everything which is wrong with society. We have now people fighting with people over votes. The issue is with the bots, You have to wonder why all the time is spent downvoting the user, and not the bot to reduce its power and the attractiveness of using one.
Don't attack your neighbor attack the invading bot. Remove the power of the bot and it just sits there doing nothing.
The biggest part of the profit goes to the bot creator who just sits back and laughs at the user and downvoters of those who use.
Pretty much like the bankers. I do hope you are not a banker now I said that.
Might be an alternative view to consider.
In the FAQ under the title.
Plagiarism, Spam, and Abuse
What is considered spam or abuse?
Selling or offering to buy votes/resteems/follows, or schemes that facilitate this.
The bot is the initial starting point, you should punish the bot.
It is like cigarette's, in each generation cigarettes get pushed onto the young in some manner. If there were no cigarettes we would all be healthier and happier as we would all be smoking marijuana.
So you know...
The bot owners, specifically me, do not sit back and laugh as you say at our customers. I work daily on ways to not only help this tyrants victims but also reduce spam on this platform.
The bots are also not doing anything wrong. This monster just wants to push his own agenda while stealing from good people as well as the reward pool itself.
Bots can be useful. I have tried them in games before, that is where I got my understanding I have of them. While it is wrong as I have done, class all with one cast. I apologize for that was not the intention. It was meant solely for that particular debate, where one party in an opinion was seen to have been hard done by.
I admit I do not use a bot I would need to pay for and would use one I would not need to pay for.
We stand ourselves on opposite sides of the bot debate. I do not condemn them, I dislike the abuse they can bring. Which might be one part we both can agree on. The sit back and laugh part was hypothetical in that a participant has been punished for the actions of the creator's bot which those methods are disagreed upon. Enlighten the audience remove the power from the bot. To punish the user in an instance is to dictate the terms a user can work under and must follow one to know and comply with their agenda. Target the supply or create an alternative, to punish unfairly is wrong on all counts.