You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: An open letter to @robinhoodwhale...
@anahilarski is a graphics designer and he created the logo for @dollarvigilante he does not manage the account , please read the actual post before you say anything about it
Please remove your flag from this post. It does not deserve that response, even if you disagree.
I agree on that one , it is removed . I think that the fact that @anahilarski has not been noticed that much is the reason they are supporting it.
"the fact that @anahilarski has not been noticed that much"
That's not a fact. There are hundreds of good quality accounts unnoticed but that don't have the powerfull whale @dollarvigilante as their proxy. Clearly @anahilarski counts with powerfull friends since day one here on steemit and there is nothing wrong about that fact. But the point is, because of that situation she is clearly not an "isolated small fish" on this platform in need of the @robinhoodwhale initiative.
You "flaged" this post, so you are clearly against freedom of speech. @anahilarski is clearly related to HEAVY WHALES here on steemit like HER client @dollarvigilante. The open question to the @robinhoodwhale remains unanswered: why are they supporting an account that is clearly NOT a minnow and is already supported by whales, instead of upvoting real unnoticed accounts.
PS: The fact that you flag a simple question is not helping at all...
Steemjustice thanks for doing this. By the way, where does one see who flags a post ? I see the flag but no way of seeing who did ?
@azaan removed the flag, so our post is now without flags. You would see it as a "-" vote instead of a "+" vote.
I almost flagged it myself because this is a false statement:
and this entire post is accusatory. This is also untrue:
because @anahilarski is not a whale.
If your intention is to troll here on Steemit (something your first post, your account name of "steemjustive", and your response in the comments so far seem to indicate), you will probably be flagged more because you're harming the network (IMO). That's not a "freedom of speech" issue IMO. It's a community standards on steemit.com issue. If you want to create your own blockchain viewer which does not respect community consensus via the reputation system and flags, you are free to do so as it is open source. That's not a community many would like to be a part of, however.
This is also not true:
As the image I added to the comment you made on my post indicates, @anahilarski is, in fact, a minnow based on Steem Power.
"So basically @anahilarski manages the @dollarvigilante account"
It's not a "false statement" as @anahilarski herself is promoting the fact that the @dollarvigilante is her client. So @dollarvigilante is a client account of @anahilarski and that fact means she is already well conected here on steemit and that fact means she is not an isolated "small fish" in need of the @robinhoodwhale initiative.
So you may disagree with our point but please stop calling us liars when we just put facts into perspective.
To me, you're trying to imply @anahilarski is rewarded by @dollarvigilante's success, simply because they are a client. If you disagree with who @robinhoodwhale promotes, why not talk to them in chat in civilized manner unless your intention is to create public drama?
You're defining "minnow" in a subjective way regarding if they have important relationships (from your perspective), not in terms of something concrete like Steem Power.
I did not use the accusatory term "liar" which implies intent to deceive as a character trait. I simply pointed out, based on my understanding of the words used, the statements made were not true.
You have not answered my question as to why this wasn't brought up in chat with them directly instead of as a public accusation. I think the RHW project is a potentially great initiative as an alternative to individual whales' votes determining the fate of the content here. Accusing them of wrongdoing right off the bat is counter productive to building their reputation which will be important for their success.
An open letter is a civilized manner an actually we are already talking on this post with the @robinhoodwhale
And regarding this:
NO. We are not implying anything we are explicitly poiting at facts. And the fact is @anahilarski is not an isolated "small fish" on steemit. She is conected with @dollarvigilante (as she stated on ther introduction post), so he clearly doesn't need @robinhoodwhale's help. Remember those small fish that have no powerfull friends on steemit, those were the openly promoted targets of the @robinhoodwhale initiative...
My first post was a call to @steemcleaners to take care of plagiarist @foodie aka @ecoosha
This would be case #2.