You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Justin Sun and The Steem Honey Badger
For four years @ned, Stinc, @dantheman, and principals involved assured investors that the founder's stake was earmarked for development, and would not be used for governance.
If we are truly decentralized and consider ourselves outside of a central authority, then put the Ninja Stake down like a rabbit dog. @null|Mr. Sun
Please note that ALL STEEM was originally 'ninjamined' into existence. Thereafter the only Steem that has been created was via the rewards pool. Any demand to send all ninjamined stake to @null is a demand to send virtually all Steem to @null.
Please avoid using this language to refer to the founder's stake, as that is actually what you mean to refer to, and not all other stake that was ninjamined into existence, and upon which the Steem community is dependent, and cannot exist without.
To be clear, the STEEM which was in the following wallets at the time of 22.2's deployment:
misterdelegation
steem
steemit
steemit2
steemitadmin
I do know which Steem you meant to refer to. However, using the term ninjamine refers to all original Steem not generated by the rewards pool. There are folks that don't understand that.
Also, by making the mining of Steem an issue justifying forking off those accounts, you're making an argument for forking off every other whale on the platforms accounts. No point in making that argument at all.
The only reason the founder's stake is at issue is that the founder's repeatedly said they wouldn't use it for governance, and didn't, and also that it would be used for development, for which it was, until Tron bought it. That's the actual issue, and making that argument doesn't threaten anyone elses stake, because it doesn't apply to anyone elses stake.
Point well taken. 👍