The Origin of Man in The Theory of Evolution.

in #science7 years ago (edited)


##### In the nineteenth century, the world of science echoed with the results of a controversial new study, the results of this study suggest that humans derive from a long process of evolution,vthe most famous name in this theory is charles Robert Darwin.
In 1859, Darwin put forward his theory of evolution in his book, On the Origin of Species: Survival of the Fittest by Means of Natural Selection, this book is believed to be the first in explaining about this theory, in this book put forward the creature evolved from the simplest type of organism (microbaunicelluler) until it becomes a complete being (multicelluler) with a period of up to hundreds of millions of years.
After the name Darwin, then reappeared a name as the originator of the real theory of evolution, he is Alfred Russel Wallace, then he made a book, entitled *On the Tendency of Organisme to Depart from the Original Type.
According to the theory of evolution, human beings on earth do not just appear, but require the process of evolution for the formation of the human.
The following is a sequence of human events according to the theory of evolution.
Early life is a form of unicelluler microorganisms with imperfect forms, as time goes by, nature chooses piecemeal unicelluler microorganisms to evolve into multicelluler microorganisms with perfect cells *(eukaryotic multicelluler microorganisms) *.
Subsequently evolved into low-level plants, and the next stage will be high-level plants.
From the evolution of microorganisms into plants there is branching, with perfect mutations being the form of higher animals, then become a bigger animal, accidentally, from one of these animals be human.
They took evidence for that theory from the discovery of skulls leading to human skulls.And there are other evidences that evolutionists claim: the development of a changed human embryo, starting from the embryo form of fish, rabbits, and other animals, until finally shaped human.

The results of this study I obtained while conducting religious training in a state institution, and this study has been submitted to all members of the training.

I myself do not believe in this theory, because if it is true, then man is not all born of a woman's womb.

Because logically, if indeed the human base of the evolution of hundreds of millions of years, then if we see, human events, within two years after the direct marriage can happen to another human being, then how we declare thousands of years. and if it is a process, is it a process that is not real. and in my opinion again if it is true, then man can be made not need seed or parent.

source

Thank you. hopefully useful for your knowledge.

Sort:  

You got an Upvote & Resteem from @getresteem!

Can you clarify your last statement

if it is true, then man is not all born of a woman's womb.

its a bit unclear to me how you came to that conclusion from evolutionary theory.

yes, it concerns the origin of man according to the theory of evolution not for all, I mean if true man is formed according to that theory, then it could be human not born from mother, because in theory mentioned * accidentally be the human * this darwin theory which is not believe man comes from adam.

Theory of evolution, I refute for it, my mind refuses to justify man comes from the theory of evolution, not the vision of the theory of evolution.
Thank you.