Sort:  

yes, they have. I'm not debating that. what science cannot tell is how much is natural and how much is man made. so saying that it is all natural versus saying that it is all climate change is unprovable for at least another 1000 years. i look at it from a pollution of resources standpoint. we are using natural resources at an incredible rate with no thought to future generations, and selling water rights to rich companies at a pittance to bottle and sell instead of preserving it for the people who live on the land. whether or not climate change exists is a red herring. the reason to disprove it is so governments and corporations can continue selfish practices at the cost to the consumer. they want zero regulation. this is greed, pure and simple.

welcome aboard @torico!!! My blog is dedicated to exposing all this, and why a money-free society can stop the damage done to humanity and Nature alike. The problem is speculation... and money without speculation is nonsensical and crashes the subjectivity of value. Getting rid of it is just another easy step.

ive seen it, and i was around ages ago fighting the same cause. im just not much of a joiner. but i respect your work.

yes the system is inimical and I too preferred to remain a lone wolf for many years. But I realized that many people seek for a different understanding. And that the Truth must remain out there, available.