Twin Paradox Fallacy - Time Misconceptions and Faster Than Light Communication
20 seconds to say 1 Mantra.
(plus 1 second between Mantras)
21 seconds per Mantra/pause.
There are 86,400 seconds in 24 hours. That’s 4114.28571 Mantras per day.
That’s 1,501,714.29 Mantras per year.
(31,536,000 seconds)
... for 30 years = 45,051,428.6 mantras.
(946,080,000 seconds)
1 Twin leaves Earth and travels at ‘light speed’ for 30 years.
The other Twin stays on Earth for 30 years.
Both Twins start repeating the same Mantra with the same timing before they separate.
When both Twins finally meet after 30 years…
they will have said the SAME number of Mantras, with the SAME timing.
Yet one Twin might LOOK drastically younger.
And both clocks will be drastically different.
Because the potential gradient of surrounding influence affects the rate of decay and the rate of a clock in relation to other clocks outside of that potential gradient.
A gravitational potential gradient within a plasma atmosphere has absolutely nothing to do with relativity or space curvature. Here is more information about the misconception of atomic clocks:
http://www.extinctionshift.com/SignificantFindings08_C.htm
Gravitational Potential Gradients and Refraction in Space:
https://rumble.com/vbtco9-dr.-edward-dowdye-gravitational-potential-gradient-and-refraction-in-space.html
And the bi-product of achieving the technology to travel that fast without inertia, G forces etc. means there would be an excess of “electrons” to prevent oxidation/decomposition at the same rate as the Twin on Earth. Therefore, the Twin traveling at light speed would APPEAR younger, yet still be the same age.
Like picking 2 apples from the same tree.
1 apple sits in the Sun while the other is vacuum packed in the refrigerator.
After 30 days… the apple left in the Sun will have decomposed at a faster rate than the apple in the more isolated condition.
1 apple will LOOK younger even though they are the same age. Because they decomposed at different rates from surrounding or lack of surrounding influence.
Time/ Reality was not distorted between the 2 apples or the 2 Twins.
Time is Not relative between observers whatsoever.
Time is the same from all frames of reference… and the velocity of light is dependent upon the velocity of the light source. (meaning, time stays the same while the speed of light shifts).
NOT that the velocity of light is the same from all frames of reference and that time dilates.
Einstein said that if other solutions could yield the same conclusions as relativity… That relativity would not be needed and would eventually collapse.
Here is one such alternative solution to the Invariance of the Wave.
Invariance of the Wave based from classic Physics and Galilean transformations.
Yielding the same results without needing relativity, corrections… And without illusions!
∂²φ/∂x² + ∂²φ/∂y² + ∂²φ/∂z² - 1/c² (∂²φ/∂t²) = 0
The HYPOTHETICAL OBSERVER would find
Φ = ΦₒSin2π (νt + 1/λ x) to be a solution of the wave equation of the PRIMARY wave at velocity c relative to S, where νλ = c, but at velocity c'≠ c relative to the rest frame.
The ORDINARY OBSERVER would find
Φ’ = Φ’ₒSin2π (ν’t’ + 1/λ’ x’) to be a solution of the wave equation of the secondary wave at velocity c relative to S’.
IMPORTANT NOTE!!! THERE IS NO TIME DILATION IN EUCLIDEAN SPACE UNDER ELECTRODYNAMICS OF GALILEAN TRANSFORMATIONS!
Thus t’ = t (meaning, time is the same from all frames of reference, not the velocity of light)
Both the HYPOTHETICAL and ORDINARY OBSERVER would find that the velocity of the wave being observed is always:
ν'λ'= [ν(1± cv)][λ(1± cv)−1]= νλ = c relative to its MOST primary source.
Differentiating the equation for Φ twice after t and x, the HYPOTHETICAL OBSERVER gets
∂²Φ/∂t² =−Φ(2π)² ν² = ν² λ² ∂²Φ/∂x²
And
∂²φ/∂x² + ∂²φ/∂y² + ∂²φ/∂z² - 1/ν² λ² ∂²Φ/∂t² = 0
The ORDINARY OBSERVER derives
∂²φ’/∂x’² + ∂²φ’/∂y’² + ∂²φ’/∂z’² - 1/ν’² λ’² ∂²Φ’/∂t’² = 0
t = t'
c ≠ c'
c' = c ± v
Time is the same from all frames of reference, Not the velocity of light.
Classic Physics vs Relativity
Reality vs Fiction
Part 1 - Light and Space
Re-Emissions and Dr. Edward Dowdye
https://rumble.com/vbs6cx-classic-physics-vs-relativity-history-examples-and-alternatives-jason-verbe.html
Part 2 - Time and Gravity
Real-Time vs Space-Time:
https://rumble.com/vbs6ir-gravity-and-time-classic-physics-vs-relativity-jason-verbelli.html
Plasma Physics - Flaws & Corrections:
https://photos.app.goo.gl/UMtr6CvhttWXETJ48
Why Should We Question Relativity? (FAQs) - From Dr. Dowdye's site:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220105083912/http://extinctionshift.com/FAQ.htm
Relativity suggests that Light and Time are directly linked. That if light takes 100 years to reach us... that we will be seeing 100 years in the past. The entire notion of Relativity as it pertains to Time… states that the velocity of light is the Same from ALL frames of reference.. but that Time can dilate.
But Time is NOT relative. And Classic Physics suggests that if there is complete darkness… and it takes light 100 years to reach us from a source... that you won't see that source for 100 years... but as soon as that light reaches you.... you will see that source IN REAL TIME. RIGHT NOW! NOT looking in the past as the source was 100 years ago. And then seeing the progression of history within the light in the order by which it is received.
It's just that the light allows you to see what's going on RIGHT NOW when you couldn't see before.
The light is simply illuminating the current scenario.
Like turning on a light switch in your own room. Can't see anything in real time before you turn on the light. But when the light reaches you... you see everything in real time. Immediately.
Doesn’t matter if the location is lit with a dim red light or a bright blue light or soft white light, etc.
Illumination allows you to see reality as it’s happening Now.
And all locations in the universe are already illuminated from existing starlight. Therefore… anywhere we look with the naked eye, or a ground based telescope… what we see is happening right now in real-time. Regardless of distance!
That is yet another difference between Relativity's perspective and Classic Physics. Relativity says that you will observe the history of the event within the light, and in the order by which the photons hit you.
And if you travel the speed of light, you can’t see or experience any events or reality or age because you are traveling at the rate of “photons” which they claim “experience zero time”, etc. Because Relativity says Space and Time are linked. (with velocity and gravity too)
Classic physics says you will observe the location once that location is illuminated. And you will observe that location in Real-Time.
Time is the same from ALL frames of reference in Classic Physics.
(and I want everyone to realize the consequences of what that means)
If you travel faster than 186,272 miles a second, you will simply observe a location in real-time… just that you will be approaching or receding very quickly.
Because ‘c’ is a constant and not a limit.
And mass does not fluctuate or increase with velocity.
When we see stars and galaxies, we are NOT looking back in time!
And some of the signals/ radio bursts attributed to distant bodies are not even coming from those systems at all. They are hearing and measuring signals that are coming from sources that are long gone.
Since the sources that would have emitted any signals we receive would extinguish or coordinates drastically changed by the time we receive them.
So if we look in that particular direction… thinking a signal came from there… We might detected something from a long time ago yet we are looking at an existing body in real time. So they think what they are looking at is creating a given signal.
What they hear and what they see are not necessarily linked. Since what you see is NOW and what you hear are delayed transmissions.
The discrepancies with Time between distant locations… what we see in real-time verses a delay in a transmission between those same locations… those discrepancies cannot be reconciled or explained by Relativity.
We See distant locations in Real-Time, even though Relativity says we should be seeing the location as it was in the past.
What we see with our eyes is always Real-Time… but any transmissions are delayed. Reality itself is Not a transmission. If you were able to see an astronaut on the surface of mars with your naked eye through a ground based telescope in your backyard… you could see them hold up a cue card and read the message in real-time.
You could read the message before the radio transmission arrived 3.03 minutes later if the astronaut recorded and sent the message through radio. (Which propagates at the speed of light)
So proponents of Relativity are forced to dismiss the argument totally.
And when they are challenged… they get quite angry and label the argument as “crackpot” or “pseudoscience”, “pet theories”, “fringe”, “Dunning-Kruger”, “nonsense”, “flat earth” and outstandingly ridiculous excuses to avoid discussing the data.
They ridicule, ignore, dismiss, whine and complain, “show me the math” but then refuse to look at the data while claiming victory.
They have lost their way in science.
Experiments collect evidence to suggest your understanding of a process is accurate… until more evidence is collected to contradict that understanding.
Experiments can never prove a theory. Experiments can only disprove a theory. Hypothesis is formed and a theory is developed to explain that hypothetical scenario. When new evidence is gathered… you abandon the former theory and develop a new hypothesis based upon the new information.
Yet articles and news media constantly claim their latest experiments “prove relativity.”
While dismissing any other alternative explanations.
The evidence of clocks ticking differently is due to them being in different parts of a potential gradient. (Which has nothing to do with some fictional 4D space-time curvature) Has nothing to do with "time"/reality dilating.
Reality is experienced in the NOW by everyone in the universe simultaneously. Regardless of speed or direction.
No looking into the past due to distance and light and space-time, etc.
The claim that "photons don't experience time" is quackery and untrue.
That is Relativistic nonsense saying that reality itself is experienced by observers dependent upon the order by which photons hit you.
And if you travel faster (in any direction...) that time will slow down for you. Because they link time with reality with speed with space with light with gravity. And none of them are linked at all. (except for Reality/Time... or Real-Time)
If someone travelled at light speed at sea level.. there would be no difference between clocks. If you are stationary at sea level there is no difference either.
If someone travelled at light speed in an orbit at the altitude of Mt. Everest... there might be nanoseconds of difference between clocks compared to sea level. Because the clocks are in a different potential gradient. Nothing to do with velocity.
If you are stationary at Mt. Everest altitude, there will still be nanoseconds difference compared to sea level.
If someone travelled at light speed in an orbit equal to the distance of the center of the galaxy... the clocks will be off by millions of years... yet there would be NO difference in reality between locations. Just that the clocks would be subject to different surrounding potentials which affect their particular rates.
If you are stationary relative to Earth at that distance, there will still be millions of years difference in the TRANSMISSIONS and time it takes to any sync with a clock on Earth at sea level.
Mass does not increase with velocity.
The particle accelerator effect shows the forces of the walls of the containment acting on the particles themselves.
Because the walls of the containment absorb the energy within the containment system. And then re-emit it back onto the contained particles.
So the surrounding potential increases as they ramp up their power… Which they confuse with the mass itself increasing and fluctuating.
When really it is the surrounding potential that is increasing.
And the potential is acting on the walls of the container which are affecting the particles contained therein.
But in the void there is no containment.
There are gravitational potentials and electrostatic potentials from other bodies that a charged particle will pass nearby or pass through. (Which will give a false impression from contained lab experiments and applying that logic into open space.)
The mathematical consequence of Galilean transformations says mass does not fluctuate. So the scientific community has a duty to come up with a different explanation/theory on why particles SEEM to increase mass.
It is an illusion.
And the mathematical consequences of Galilean transformations expose that illusion.
Which means in reality… There is no light speed limit.
The speed of Light is a constant from its source not a universal speed limit.
It is the DUTY of the scientific community to drop their opinions about the model with opposite consequences... and deal within the framework of the consequences of Galilean Transformations instead.
.
.
Propagation and Re-Emission of Light:
http://www.extinctionshift.com/details01.htm?fbclid=IwAR2Ul9ffJFm8PuZBW3SytPkNQMB5n06zADeRRRrO9dXD87tiDD2MoxzgLu4
Optics, Electrodynamics & Gravitation based from Re-Worked Classic Physics/ Galilean Transformations under Euclidean Space.
http://www.extinctionshift.com/short_present/ViewGraph_English.pdf
.
.
.
Summary of most important Take-Aways:
Light is not a recording of reality that is played back frame by frame dependent upon the order by which photons hit an observer.
Light is not a recording of Time or History.
Light Illuminates Reality as it IS, right now.
NOT that light shows you a distant location as it WAS... or unfolds history/ Reality… or that Time is relative.
There is only Now to witness. You could never experience or observe the past of a distant location.
Even though you can receive a delayed SIGNAL or transmission... a flash or burst.
But Reality is not a signal or transmission that can delay.
You do not observe the history of reality within a flash of light.
A wavepacket simply illuminates what currently Is.
Two options.. and everyone is aware of the first model of Relativity.
.1. Velocity of Light stays the same to All observers while Time shifts.
(Space-Time)
(… but what does it REALLY mean if the opposite were true?)
.2. That the speed of light shifts, while Time stays the same… to ALL observers.
(Real-Time)
The above presentation is what that means… that Time is NOT relative to observers.
And we are NOT looking back in time when we see stars… regardless of distance and velocity.
Extremely important people understand the implications of Classic Physics as it pertains to Time. And how it is the exact Opposite to Relativity.
Relativity says the speed of light is the same to ALL observers no matter what. While time shifts/ dilates.
Classic Physics says Time is the same to ALL observers to matter what. While the speed of light shifts. (dependent upon the speed of the light source)
Play with it in your head...
What does it REALLY mean if Time is the same from All frames of reference?
What are the consequences?
It means that when we see galaxies and stars.. we are NOT looking back in time as they WERE.
We are seeing them as they ARE.
Even though clocks will delay between locations because of a difference of gravitational potential gradients.
Einstein foolishly said, "Let's define time by what clocks measure."
But clocks in different locations will register a different tick rate... so if you judge objective reality itself as being dependent upon the face of a clock... then you will have a false impression of reality and time. (Just because you take your fingers and wind a clock faster or slower does not mean you are speeding up or slowing down time relative to you or anything else.)
Let's just deal with Star A in relation to Planet O for a moment.
Star A is 10 light minutes away from Planet O.
So, if there were complete darkness and then Star A turns on for 20 full minutes…
(starting at 12:00:00 Noon on Planet O)
And then Star A blinks off like a light switch after 20 minutes at 12:20:00 …
For how long would an observer on Planet O observe the light?
For how many minutes would an observer at Planet O be illuminated?
The observer at Planet O will see a flash at 12:10:00.
And Planet O would be illuminated by the red light of Star A for 20 minutes, Until 12:30:00.
Because the source emitted the light for 20 minutes.
Even though there is a delay and the source stopped emitting… There is a back-end to the Emission. So it will take 20 minutes before the observer at Planet O sees the light cut off.
The initial flash represents the Wave-Front..
But the light will get cut off after 20 minutes which would represent the Wave-End.
The observer on Planet O would not view Star A back in time 10 minutes.
It would just take 10 minutes for the initial boundary of the wave-packet to hit the observer which would appear as a flash.
The flash would appear 10 minutes after Star A started emitting. Because it takes light 10 minutes to propagate from Star A to Planet O.
Planet O would be able to observe Star A for 20 minutes in real time. Regardless of distance. The observer at Planet O would observe a darkened black body coming from the location of where the light originated.
So now… If Star A is 1 million light years away…
And the star is shining for 1 million years… then explodes and stops emitting light… how long would it take until the observer at Planet O stops seeing the light emitted from that location?
It will take 1 million years.
Even if the source of the light is long gone. The back-end of the emission still needs to take 1 million years before it is cut off 1 million light years away to Planet O.
And you are not looking back in time 1 million years!
It's just that the light from that particular star 1 Million light years away… Is illuminating your location. In real time. And it will take 1 million years before the light stops coming from that location.
Which means you only have 1 million years of real-time illumination by that particular source.
Not that you are looking at the star 1 million years “as it was in the past.” The light from many sources is still saturating the galaxy even though many of those sources are long gone.
Now apply that logic with emissions of gravity. (Which propagates like light)
There is a front end and back end to a wave-packet or source emitting the constant influence.
When the source ceases and explodes… it still takes time for back-end of the gravity and the light to stop.
And time is not involved at all. Only that reality is illuminated by light. ANY light.
Light and time and velocity are not linked whatsoever.
Time is NOT relative. Reality does NOT dilate or delay.
.png)
It would take something like 43 minutes to get a radio message to/from Jupiter back to Earth. Or even about 40 minutes from Jupiter to Mars.
But if we had space stations and outposts between Jupiter and Earth…
And a person looking through a telescope at the next outpost… Someone could hold up a cue card or wave Semaphore flags and interpret the message in Real-Time… faster than the radio signal could propagate in 43 minutes at the speed of light.
No spooky action at a distance or “quantum entanglement” at all.
There's nothing spooky about it and there is no entanglement.
.png)
What they think happened 13.8 billion years ago… Is actually happening right now in real time. Everything imaged by the Hubble telescope was happening in Real-Time at the moment the image was captured.
You can never view the past. Light is not a recording of Reality.
Light simply illuminates Reality as it IS.
Any images or observations collected are viewing what is happening in real time. Whatever is being recorded… Is happening in real time at the moment it is being recorded. Whatever is being observed… Is happening in real time at the moment it is being directly observed.
Any locations bathed in Star light allow you to observe those locations in Real-Time... regardless of distance or speed or direction.
There is no proof for any big bang. And the evidence can be easily dismantled through the work of Dr. Pierre-Marie Robitaille and Professor Herouni.
There is no context for humanity to have any idea for the true age of the universe at this time.
Why is there no time dilation in Star Trek or Star Wars?
Almost as if Time is the same to all planets throughout the galaxy far far away… No matter the distance. They can travel between planets and star systems, and there is no difference in Reality between locations. They have it correct in the movies in that regard, but not in real life when it comes to Time.
(Especially for Interstellar… They completely went full blown science-fiction nonsense on that one… and they tout it as the most accurate… smh)
Wave-fronts and Wave-Ends
There is a front end and back end to every pulse, wave-packet/ emission.
If the “pulse” lasts 1 million years… then, when that source/ star expires… the light and packets that have already been emitted will still propagate out.
And there will be a delay between before the constant signal gets cut off.
As another visual example...
Turn on your garden hose...
Now put your thumb over the nozzle… Now remove your thumb from the nozzle… now put your thumb back on the nozzle… Now remove your thumb from the nozzle again… Once every two seconds.
What happens?
There is a stream of water that lasts for two seconds.
Water... no water.... Water... no water.
But when you put your thumb over the hose… the stream of water that already left the hose continues to propagate away. There is a front end and back end to each stream of water.
The water that already came out the hose continues to propagate away from it…
Even though you turn off the water. The water that already left continues propagating.
The light that already left the laser pointer continues to propagate away from it… Even though you turn off the laser pointer. The light that already left continues propagating.
The light and gravity that already left a star or body continues to propagate away from it... even if the body expires, blows up, ceases etc.
... therefore… There is a front end and a back end to each wave packet. But the wave end only occurs when the source stops emitting.
The distance between the wave-front and wave-end is the length of time the source first started emitting verses when that emission ceases.
Leave the hose on for 1 minute... you have a 1 minute long stream of water.
(Which propagates a given distance according to its speed which is proportional to the PSI and opening of the hose nozzle etc.)
Leave the laser pointer on for 1 minute... you have a 1 light minute long beam.
With a front end and back end.
(Propagating in a particular direction away from the source but with the output energy in watts and measured in lumens etc.)
When technology will allow... Humanity can test these ideas and compare the observations in reality with claims made by Relativists. The discrepancies in Relativity cannot be reconciled.
EXAMPLE 1 - FIXED POSITION
.
.
EXAMPLE 2 - 1 FIXED AND 1 IN MOTION APPROACHING
Propagation and Re-Emission of Light:
https://web.archive.org/web/20160331145545/http://www.extinctionshift.com/details03.htm
.
.
.
Credible Challenges to Relativity and more from Dr. Edward Dowdye. Retired NASA Engineer, University Professor of Mathematics and Internationally recognized expert in Optics/ LASERs/ Satellites.
Dr. Dowdye Bio, some background and qualifications:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220102025727/http://extinctionshift.com/author.htm
The brilliant work of Dr. Edward Dowdye:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220122163149/http://www.extinctionshift.com/
Models of Gravity and Misconception of "Aether":
https://steemit.com/science/@verbz/models-of-gravity-and-misconception-of-aether
Mathematical Consequences and The Atrophy of Communication:
https://steemit.com/science/@verbz/mathematical-consequences-and-the-atrophy-of-communication