You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The Rind Study: censored
I'll describe my feud with YouTube in more detail in a future post. I've already stated my objective in my previous comment. If I were "sexually attracted" to underage girls, I would be on the dark net, not here.
If I may question your motives, you read my post right? Do you dispute the history I presented, the congressional vote of censure of the American Psychological Association, the reply of the American Academy for the Advancement of Science?
Do you realize that the atmosphere of suspicion has a chilling effect on academic research, discouraging open discussion and further research?
You referenced a girls to women photo project. It did not include images of naked girls? I apologize if that's not the case, but the title of the work certainly makes a person think what I thought.
Yes, I do realize the chilling effect on academic research, but I went to your blog. There's a fine line between consenting adults and polyamory and children being involved sexually.
As long as you are not promoting children being sexually involved, I'm fine with exploration of the topic. Sure, it is just my opinion and age of consent is complicated (some tax farms having it as young as 13), but I'm completely against adult to child sexual interaction.
My photo-documentary "Girl Becomes Woman" contains no genital nudity, nor does any other of my work. Polyamory has nothing to do with children's sexuality. I'm glad to hear that you're against adult to child sexual abuse. So am I, as I've stated over and over again in my articles, books and comments for more than 10 years.
Thank you for clarifying then. I stand corrected and apologize. When I had an old IT business, one of my clients turned out to be into poly marriage. They had numerous people all married together of different ages. It definitely clouded the issue. As long as they were all consenting adults though, I didn't care what they were doing.