You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Announcing the Social Blockchain Working Group
I see the developers that have the most, and most relevant, understanding of Steem code meeting regarding potential improvements to the code - just when Tron is forcing a fork - as extremely important, even existentially for the community.
Clearly, forking is necessarily on the table, and these guys putting their backs into that effort when it becomes necessary is going to be absolutely the best we can hope for in that circumstance.
You seem to disagree. What action would you recommend to enable the community to move forward in the various directions the current situation could go?
This seems to be a long term plan. But the challenge that we are facing is an existential crisis of sorts and need a short term action plan and a long term vision. The word existential crisis is subjective and considers centralization of a public ledger as a (sybil) attack. Forking or otherwise (ie voting out the sybil-attackers) is required to re-establish the fact that Steem is a blockchain.
Right now Steem is a database and NOT a blockchain.
I agree and support short term efforts to establish a better chain for Steemians. Two groups can work on problems at the same time.