Nice! I like this answer.

One thing about agnosticism I find interesting is some definitions of it go so far as to say something like "It can never be known!" which is, I think, a more closed-minded perspective than an atheist (which is surprising). Example from Google:

a person who believes that nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God or of anything beyond material phenomena; a person who claims neither faith nor disbelief in God.

The "or can be known" part gets me. That differs from the definition above which suggests proof would then push them in a specific direction for or against. From my understanding, an atheist would asset theism to be true, given evidence to do so.

Love the Einstein pic. :)