It's mental how the Washington Post can go from breaking crucial stories like Watergate a few decades ago, to trying as hard as possible to obfuscate evidence-driven, demonstrably suspicious cases like this just because it doesn't suit their narrative.

Since when did journalists hate journalism so much?

Her fierce defense of the Awans at times puzzled even some in her own party. In May, Wasserman Schultz chided the Capitol Police chief during a public hearing after officers confiscated a laptop that had been left in a Capitol Building hallway. It belonged to her office and had been issued to Imran Awan.

“My concern was they were being singled out,” Wasserman Schultz told The Post.

If you honestly believe that DWS was concerned with her staffer's civil liberties, rather than just being terrified of whatever was on that laptop being exposed, then you are beyond gullible.