You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: An Interview with Steem Founder, Dan Larimer, on Creating Systems to Make the Government Obsolete
dan also pushes the idea that if we don't think the way he does we should be bullied and kicked out of society
No he doesn't.
never got a reply
Not a reason to attack him.
he basically want to censor anyone that he disagrees with and says it openly.
This is not how his program (steem) is working. I am censoring you because I think YOU are attacking someone who has done nothing wrong, the opposite in fact.
Just read my response
Are you attacking the man who built the platform you are using freely ONLY TO EARN A REWARD on the said platform ?
you say no he doesn't but if you read his post he says he does. -smh-
im not attacking him because he didn't reply, I said that because he knows he cant reply because his post was all bullshit. go look at it. I am attacking his ideas not the person.
you are part of the problem then. censorship is wrong in an form. you are doing exactally what he says people should do in the post and only proving my point.
I am attacking anyone trying to push bad ideas, the fact that it matters to you that he made steemit (or helped in making it) is why im calling it dick riding. its fine if you disagree with my opinions just like I disagree with dans, not a reason to censor you because of it.
the reason I said chack out my post is because it has dans post in it. I also provided dans post so you could look at it and then no one can say I took anything out of context. it is really old post so no I will not be earning any money or anything off of it except maybe getting people to look at what dan actually was saying and then maybe they wont be so quick to dick ride without looking at the facts.
If you think im wrong im fine with that and I even support it but to try to censor me is wrong.
I know what he wrote and its in the block chain, I do not care if you want to keep your head in the sand about reality because your to busy trying to dick ride and get some whale votes.
I fucking swear!
How do you prevent disinformation then ?
In addition, you are not "Totaly Censored", you are just less visible.
I think the default choice for people should not be to read this type of content, but if they disagree it only takes them one click to make that choice.
My opinion is still that you don't bring any factual information to the table, therefore preventing people from making an informed decision.
I won't remove the flagging.
I won't waste any more of my time on this matter.
you prevent disinformation by providing the truth and facts to prove the disinformation wrong. so with your question I have another question. if the truth is censored then how do we disprove disinformation?
I provided proof and a link to dans own post where he says all this stuff.
Im ok that you wont remove the flag but I am going to point your actions and words out to all of steemit in a flaggot post. so the choice was yours.
good day.
you may as well just make any old baseless assertion like, "a clear sky during the day is not blue."
read the posts. then, if you still want to say he is not saying, what he actually is saying, and has said, go ahead, but don't expect anyone to take you seriously.
this isn't even a matter of interpretation. he actually said straight up, that it would be better if we all agree, and that if we don't think the way he does we should be bullied and kicked out of society. he actually said that. i have a copy of it.