You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: In defense of the fork

in #steem • 6 years ago

it's stealing. you do not touch any private keys to censor them from the blockchain. dumbest idea I read in crypto in a long time.

6 years ago in #steem by
$3.58
  • Past Payouts $3.58, 0.00 TRX
  • - Author $2.69, 0.00 TRX
  • - Curators $0.89, 0.00 TRX
9 votes
Reply 4
Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     6 years ago (edited)

    Perhaps you should study ETH and ETC case a bit, and the same applies to anyone who agree with Ash. Compare their success, adoption and the history.

    After a fork there still would be Steem, nothing would change here. There'd just be another coin just like it but without a HUGE ninja mined stake (one could even call it stolen assets because others were not given the resources to mine. Yep, stealing in my eyes.).

    Is that a dumbest idea in a long time? I think not.

    $0.12
    • Past Payouts $0.12, 0.00 TRX
    • - Author $0.09, 0.00 TRX
    • - Curators $0.03, 0.00 TRX
    3 votes
    Reply
    [-]
     6 years ago 

    yup. Theft is theft.

    $0.02
    • Past Payouts $0.02, 0.00 TRX
    • - Author $0.02, 0.00 TRX
    • - Curators $0.01, 0.00 TRX
    2 votes
    Reply
    [-]
     6 years ago (edited)

    so by misleading investors on purpose and use after of freely gained (little effort/cost) stake is what exactly?

    [-]
     6 years ago 

    It is not stealing and all private keys remain untouched.