You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Details on Proposed Comment Reward Curve

in #steem8 years ago

Three things:

  1. Why no curation rewards?
  2. If no curation rewards, you obviously need a separate voting power pool. Otherwise you'll be directly incentivizing people not to vote for comments.
  3. I believe the current reward curve is plotted incorrectly on your graphs. It is n^2 + an, strictly superlinear. That is, its derivative is not 0 at n=0. I don't know if that has much effect on your conclusions, but I figured I might as well point it out.
Sort:  

If no curation rewards, you obviously need a separate voting power pool. Otherwise you'll be directly incentivizing people not to vote for comments.

If adding a separate voting power pool for comments, they could do the "8X more rshares" thing they wanted to implement a while back.

Yeah, I think that would make a lot of sense.

separate voting power pool

I disagree that this is needed. I think that the opportunity cost to voting for comments may actually be a very encouraging thing for minnows who won't have any opportunity cost. (Remember most users start as a minnow)

https://steemit.com/comments/@beanz/why-should-commenters-make-38x-more-rewards