You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steem 2.0 is coming like a big wave and if you can read this you're gonna catch it.
Not to mention - dividing 7000 active people up into groups will kill the pitiful interaction here. No one's post will be seen unless it goes in a group. Then the group only has a handful of people so the only way to vote is in a circle jerk.
Interaction dies - no one can succeed.
I'm so sorry to see this happen.
Interest perspective. But already the circle jerks are happening with auto voting and the trending page. In communities curators will be very important to bring in new members and help nuture new users.
If there are 50 groups - there will only be 140 people per group. That is not enough people to sustain a community or be inviting to anyone from outside.
where do you come up with dividing people into groups? whats getting divided? SMTs are completely different from steemit. their for different ventures to create their own platforms. steemit will still be the core as the tokens will need steem power for their bandwidth.
I was referring to communities dividing steemit bloggers.
I've been in many Facebook groups with less than 50 people and seen constant interaction, why wouldn't people do the same and get paid instead?