You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Open Letter to @iamjosephyoung and CCN regarding Steem
Hello JRcornel, this is Joseph from CCN and Forbes.
I just read the letter and I have to agree, I think it was a careless oversight from my part.
I plan to write a full feature on CCN to properly explain Steem and its capabilities as a blockchain protocol. I have asked Ned Scott for an interview and he agreed, so I'll doing that very soon and publish something by next week.
I've also made a Steemit account after reading this and I read up a lot about Steem today.
Thanks,
Joseph
Please do not include an interview with Ned, we need it to be accurate and not full of empty promises.
hahahahaha. i just sprayed my coffee :P
at time i tried to post some thing like this but steemit does not encourage me and no one seems to upvote my post @berniesanders your post is good
@hellojosephyoung, thanks so much for engaging on Steemit and looking to correct those inaccuracies! I'm Steemit's Content Director and would happily answer any questions you might have with respect to steemit.com, Steem, or the differences between them. My e-mail is [email protected]. Welcome to Steemit!
I appreciate that, I'll definitely contact you via email soon and hopefully we can stay in touch for future coverage and articles. Thanks for the warm welcome :) seems like the Steemit community is very friendly
The largest majority of our community will bend over backwards to help you in any way we can, the rest sell the rewards pool 'because they can'.
This is the most accurate definition of the Steem community I have come across.
Best community on the internet :) Talk soon
I agree, @andrarchy . I'm co-admin of The Writers' Block, and our sub-community is a force of nature. We just incorporated a publishing house set to be the first crypto-based publishing house in the industry. We have a full staff of editors, a legal team, and now we're in talks with a marketing team with eyes on an SMT. All of this is possible because of the Steem blockchain, and Steemit, Inc., which brought us all together.
That is fantastic. Thank you for your reply. Oh and by the way, sorry if my letter came off as a bit harsh. Upon re-reading it, it was a little harsher than I intended it to be. :) Welcome to Steem and Steemit and I look forward to reading your next publications on steem!
Hey , @jrcornel , i noticed that many users doesnt understand the concept of steem witness , so i made a comprehensive content to help users understand and how to vote witness also check it out please curate to encourage the hardwork , resteem if the content is usefull for other users...
https://steemit.com/steemgigs/@blackempror/a-fully-comprehensive-user-guide-on-who-is-a-witness-and-how-to-vote-your-witness
Wow! I am incredibly impressed that you responded to this by doing more research and finding out that you were mistaken. Everyone makes mistakes. It is how one addresses those mistakes that shows his/her true character.
Welcome to the platform!
Ok to clarify. It seemed the contest would concluded when the post paid out, then I asked you about it and you said Friday. I looked and saw there had been no payouts in your account for this contest and also saw no posts about it . I am new here and I don't know who on here is just trying to drum up eyes for their work and who keeps their word yet. I have seen other contests not get paid out. I have never seen you before this, so I didn't know. I was just going by the fact that it seemed to get pushed by and I didn't see or hear anything about it.
I think this comment may have been meant for someone else. I am not running any contests.
There seems to be a new spambot that takes comments from one post and reproduces them on another in hopes of getting an upvote occasionally. They happened to hit me with one that I recognized.
Well that is a weird trick. Thanks for letting me know.
Great to see this response @hellojosephyoung. Thanks for taking up on the task on giving Steem a second look. Being here for 2 years now, I personally think it's a game-changing protocol, adding to the fact that it's hosting the most actively used apps in the cryptosphere.
If you interview @ned ask him if he can let me get a free Smart Media Token bruh bruh.
owned
I second bernie, stinc intentionally facilitated self voting knowing that it would concentrate rewards in the large accounts at the expense of the little accounts.
Now they encourage pay for play because they want to make the large stakeholders happy at the expense of everybody else.
Ned even acknowledges that linear rewards was a mistake and that superlinear rewards will have to come back.
We had an experiment running that could've made the game interesting for minnows, but instead stinc hurried up and changed the curve to linear before the truth could be known by the majority of us.
That truth being that the largest accounts have to stay out of the rewards pool if we hope to attract the masses.
Stinc has clearly demonstrated that they dont care about mass adoption, only rewarding early investors and the ninja miners.
They round down votes less than .02sbd, all those with less than 150sp have been playing a fool's game because their votes get rounded down. This just recently came to light, but has been the rule from the beginning.
I'm just a cranky poor person, so if you want an alternative viewpoint talk to @smooth, him and @abit were running the experiment that downvoted the greedy whales in order to help the minnows, he will give you straight info, imo, from one of the ninja miners.
If money equals credibility then @ats-david should get a voice, too. He has been here since early on and has paid for his stake.
@ned's credibility may be intact with those favored by early stakeholders, but those not so favored, that know the math, may have a different opinion.
I know i do.
You say you are against this “They round down votes less than .02sbd” but then you argue in favor of non-linear rewards? You do realize that if they changed to non-linear rewards, then minnows’ votes would be worth even less, right? It would be unlikely that even 10 or possibly 100 “0.01” votes would receive any payout under a non-linear rewards curve.
Where has Ned ever said it was a mistake btw?
Also the experiment that smooth and abit were running was a temporary thing intended to gather data on whether we should switch to a linear rewards curve. It was not something that was ever intended to happen permanently, and the data that was gathered was part of what made the case for switching to linear rewards.
This is excellent gesture. I think entire steemian community feels impressed with your intentions to learn more about it and then publish your impressions. And yes welcome to steem blockchain.
Could you please make an introduction post. I know u are are known personality in crypto world but that is how most of us start our journey here on Thisbe blockchain. Thnx