You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Open letter to a future Steemian
You can post FB type content here but it wont be well received as that is not the development stage the platform is in. For FB content to work you need to have a close network of people who you know. On steem at the moment for the most part people don't know each other in real life and they need something more than FB content to draw them into the new relationships. I think the FB type content is better served on a DApp running its on SMT rather than the top level of the steem blockchain; but time will tell. It is a little chicken and egg with the user base but while we try and have the top level be everything to everyone it is going to be difficult to make the majority happy.
What's interesting is that dtube doesn't have blog posts, but steemit does have dtube posts. Steemhunt doesn't have blog posts, but steemit does have hunt posts. Etc.
Where is the place that there is only blog content?
I think that's part of why people get annoyed on steemit. I imagine steemhunt folks would feel the same about having blog posts mixed in on there.
The dLike type content (which is a lot like FB I think), is being shown to people looking for blog articles because those people have no dapp dedicated to what they value. So they try to police everyone a way no one else (on other dapps) is doing.
Yes. I think SMT's will solve a lot of that and we can categorize content into sub platforms. View posts in Steepshot and you only see those posts from steepshot but on the top level viewers like steemit/steempeak/busy you get a mesh of all different content with a broken trending system
I just hope something is made for blog content that isn't considered "top level." It would seem to me that busy/steempeak should be that, but do they intend to? Does anyone intend to?
Time will tell.