You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Steem Protection Soft Fork 0.22.2

in #steem4 years ago

Dear @netuoso,

Did you get opinions from STEEM community? I think witnesses should have discussed with steem community and act for steem community.

It was surprising that Justin bought Steemit.inc. Likewise, witnesses suddenly did soft fork without talking with the community and listening more...

your decision and action made community surpsrized. This is so disappointing.

Sort:  

Have you even taken a moment to get the context around this and read all of the witness announcements?

Have you taken a moment to realize that Justin Sun has already reached out in response to the fork and is seeking an amicable resolution by meeting with the witnesses?

Finally, have you taken a moment to understand how Steem works, and what it means when you vote for, or don't vote for, witnesses?

your decision and action made community surpsrized

Did you talk to every single community member to make that claim or are you just making a claim on their behalf; kind of like you are accusing the witnesses of doing?

yes. I read all.

I think this soft fork is a little bit coercive. This post includes stakeholders, even if you guys discussed on private room.

This statement has been co-authored by the Steem community, which includes witnesses, developers & stakeholders. - https://steemit.com/steem/@softfork222/soft-fork-222

How many people included on discussion? 10? 20?

If you want to write this way (co-authored by the Steem community, which includes witnesses, developers & stakeholders), I think you should invite some stakeholders more on your discussion room at least.

How many people include on this discussion and decide? I think it is better to tell community the numbers involved in community decision making.

So you are just upset that you personally were not invited?

There were over 65+ people in there representing their witness voters.

If you don't like the way Steem governance works, I really suggest you rethink your decision to be a part of the Steem network.

Maybe do a little more research into how Steem governance works, how witnesses are elected, and how a majority consensus decision can change EVERYTHING about Steem.

I find it hilarious that the Steem users that put in very little effort into improving Steem for everyone somehow think they should have been included directly in the conversation. Guess you must REALLY hate politics?

I didn't know the number of people discussed this soft fork. Most of people on community suddenly hear softfork 0.22.2 news. I point out that.

I already know steem, how to elect witness.

Also, I disagree this soft fork. Ok. I vote the witnesses who disagree softfork 0.22.2.

I proxyed my power to @proxy.token. This account disagrees softfork 0.22.2.

Good job for actually doing something!

Now go about your business and keep trying to get support for others. Have a good one!

Steem on!