@vandeberg, I think discussions would be more productive if you had them with witnesses and a couple of guys who thought a lot about steem economics (like @donkeypong or @trafalgar etc..). Opening this discussion to everyone doesn't seem to help, judging by the quality of comments under this post. Just informing the community about the changes would be enough, when and if they will come.
We (witnesses) have such conversations all the time, but feedback from "general public" is important. Nobody is perfect, we make mistakes too, we can overlook something.
We can do ours best to make good decisions for the sake of the platform, but in the end we represent SP holders who vote for us. Of course we can't expect that every user to be an expert in Steem internals, but they don't have to. They "hire" witnesses.
TL;DR: it's good to have a feedback, even if it's not that great (of quality) ;-)
Yes but they have to pretend to be asking people their opinion so they can act as if they "care" about the community all whilst doing whatever the fuck suits them best. Quit ball washing. Your nose is brown.
I flag trash. You have received a flag.
Not ball washing since I consider myself as one of the people who shouldn’t be asked.
Posted using Partiko iOS
Asking us questions is like asking little kids "if they are excited for Santa to come this Christmas".. it is just to pacify.. not for any other reason. They are paying you "lip service"and they don't give a flying fuck what you want, nor do they care about what your opinions are.
I flag trash. You have received a flag.