You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steem Governance is Multiparty
I could hardly believe he tried to use that one and essentially try to tell me I am lying. I know what he's trying to get at -- something about DPoS really -- or making demands on others in a system he opted into -- but I don't think he has articulated it to himself yet.
You could be lying. This isn't out of the realm of what is possible. Acting as we know something we actually ignore is foolish.
Is there a mouse in your pocket?
No.
Then note your “we” does not include me. Assuming despite refutation that I don’t know freedom is no one in this company is asinine. Beyond that there’s plenty of argument for DPoS that it doesn’t matter who Freedom or Blocktrades are. All the parties youve been complaining about are Stakeholders. DPoS is held together by Stakeholders’ Incentives and Pareto Principle despite Tragedy of the Commons. Understand that first.
What you know and what you've stated didn't invalidate any of the points I've made in my first comment. Also, I didn't complain about any Stakeholders. I've merely stated facts.
Is it a fact that it’s all an “issue” as you stated? I’ll stop bothering to respond to you if you believe you’re stating facts only while not doing that — that’s contradictory and a waste of my time.
The points I've made are part of Steem's reality and aren't insignificant. You are free to argue otherwise.
Get your story straight please. Have you stated facts or made points? Points are extrapolations about facts. Not equivlaent. Stop backpedaling and make your Point clear instead of hiding under the guise “facts”.