You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: NO! Steemit Inc is not Steem and Ned is not our Messiah
Those top witnesses generally follow the lead of the main contributor and in fact owner of the blockchain code,
Mind explaining how you see the open source code as being owned by someone?
I'm very well aware that it is open source, but open source does not preclude the possibility of ownership. As you're probably hoping to point out though, it does bear thinking about as it's not entirely clear.
This post musing on the subject is a pretty good consideration of the subject, here are a few of the most relevant points:
If you read this, and especially the entire post, perhaps you can see where I am coming from with my claim that Steemit owns the blockchain (the
steemd
project) code.Here's another interesting announcement from the Steemit blog which could be considered the next one from the one you posted: Steemd is now completely free to use with an MIT License. The license before explicitly forbade anyone to create a new genesis block, that is, to start a different blockchain based on any part of the Steem blockchain code. It's only since this change that other blockchains like Smoke.io are legally able to use this code in their own projects.
The take home points are that open source software does not mean a fully permissive license (although Steemd now has one) and that customs and practice matter when considering ownership.
But just to be clear, yes, anyone can use it, which is probably what you're meaning to say I guess.
No, my point was that no one owns it. Your logic might hold, somewhat, on the Bitcoin Core code or the latest Google Android release. Yet even Bitcoin Core could not halt Bitcoin Cash's fork. However it goes even further with the STEEM Project, in my opinion, because the Witnesses decide the final direction of the package, not Steemit, Inc.